1995
DOI: 10.1017/s0959774300015067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of a Maya Settlement Model through Remote Sensing

Abstract: New data from Calakmul, Mexico make three principal contributions to our understanding of the ancient Maya: (1) they support the model of large regional states advocated by Marcus and Folan since the 1970s; (2) they add one more Maya site to the short list of cities linked to other cities (and to their own dependencies) by a well-planned road system; and (3) they show good fit between Central Place models and actual settlement locations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as more settlement work around major sites is completed, major roads extending kilometers out from site centers have been found, sometimes-but not always-linking sites together. Calakmul (Folan et al 1995(Folan et al , 2001a and Caracol (Chase and Chase 2001) both have major roadway systems that have been interpreted as relating to economic activities. New methods for identifying roadways on a large scale, including radar imaging, remote sensing, and GIS (Carballo and Pluckhahn 2007;Folan et al 1995;Sever and Irwin 2003), may help future efforts to understand the connections between sites, regions, and economies.…”
Section: Large-scale Spatial Patterningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as more settlement work around major sites is completed, major roads extending kilometers out from site centers have been found, sometimes-but not always-linking sites together. Calakmul (Folan et al 1995(Folan et al , 2001a and Caracol (Chase and Chase 2001) both have major roadway systems that have been interpreted as relating to economic activities. New methods for identifying roadways on a large scale, including radar imaging, remote sensing, and GIS (Carballo and Pluckhahn 2007;Folan et al 1995;Sever and Irwin 2003), may help future efforts to understand the connections between sites, regions, and economies.…”
Section: Large-scale Spatial Patterningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This economic development was accompanied by new human settlements that exploited wildlife resources surrounding the CBR and cleared land for small-scale agriculture and farming from 1890 to 1940 (Konrad, 1992). The result has been the irreversible landscape modification of the CBR region by the late twentieth century, with subsequent natural rehabilitation following lumber, sisal, and gum industry failures (Culbert, 1973;Rice, 1986;Braswell et al, 2004) and significant reduction of deterioration of the remaining conserved regions (Folan et al, 1995;. These historical changes in use and transformation of the Calakmul region and current land use and socio-cultural practices have had an important impact on biodiversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As indicated earlier, there is also no explicit acknowledgment of the second cycle in the traditional periodization. 31 29 Very few intercity road systems have thus far been discovered in the Maya lowlands, but we do have them radiating from Calakmul, Cobá, and El Mirador (Folan, Marcus, and Miller, 1995). 30 Our argument is not against the traditional periodization as a framework for archaeology, art history, or culture, but rather against its limited value for understanding the politics.…”
Section: Broader Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The sources used to reconstruct a polity's (pre)history and estimate its dates of rise and fall differ by levels of chronological precision and proximity to the field evidence. Primary sources consist of (a) structural, architectural, or other archaeological evidence (e.g., Webster, 1976;Inomata, 1994;Folan, Marcus, and Miller, 1995); as well as (b) textual information in the Mayan language, including hieroglyphic, paleographic, or other epigraphic records pertaining to social and political events (e.g., Berlin 1958;Schele and Freidel, 1990;Schele and Mathews, 1991;Marcus, 1992a). Thus, both archaeological and hieroglyphic bodies of evidence were used in this study, unlike previous studies that rely almost exclusively on epigraphic dates (Hamblin and Pitcher, 1980;Lowe, 1985;Mathews, 1985).…”
Section: Appendix: Sources and Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%