1992
DOI: 10.1016/0190-9622(92)70173-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verification of a formula for determination of preexcision surgical margins from fixed-tissue melanoma specimens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many surgeons have observed the problem of margin shrinkage at other sites. In a study on cutaneous malignant melanoma, Silverman et al [9] reported 15%-25% shrinkage in the margins depending on the patient age. In studies on rectal cancer Goldenstein et al [10] and Sondenna et al [11] noticed 50% or more shrinkage of margins, most of these occurring immediately after resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many surgeons have observed the problem of margin shrinkage at other sites. In a study on cutaneous malignant melanoma, Silverman et al [9] reported 15%-25% shrinkage in the margins depending on the patient age. In studies on rectal cancer Goldenstein et al [10] and Sondenna et al [11] noticed 50% or more shrinkage of margins, most of these occurring immediately after resection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This is largely attributed to the margin shrinkage following resection and less commonly to the presence of microscopic neoplastic foci beyond the palpable and visual margins [8]. The problem of margin shrinkage has been dealt with at other sites, but has not been analyzed and quantified in oral cavity cancers [9][10][11][12]. The only study addressing margin shrinkage in oral cavity was an animal experiment on dogs [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ex vivo specimen measurement may result in underestimation of lesion diameter by as much as 20%. 22,23 The rigor of our study design allows much greater insight into the relationship between lesion diameter and diagnosis than any previous study by using accurate lesion measurements rather than the rough estimates not uncommon in dermatologic practice. The goal of this study was to determine if a diameter measurement of greater than 6 mm was still a useful guideline in the diagnosis of melanoma.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in a study by Silverman et al [27] on 199 cutaneous malignant melanoma reported of a shrinkage of a 15 to 25% on margins of surgical specimens depending on the patient's age. Likewise, Weese et al [28] observed in ten patients who underwent colonic resection that resected rectal margin could shrink up to 50% or more after processing histologic of surgical piece.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%