2016
DOI: 10.1515/lart-2016-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbs of locomotion like идти (to go) – ходить (to walk): some thoughts on their semantic description

Abstract: The author presents the analysis of discussions about the semantic description of traditionally postulated verbs of locomotion like идти /to go/ - ходить /to walk/. The analysis reveals that there are very few ideas on the nature of the verbs that are uncontroversial. The second objective of the author is to propose a theory that not only incorporates ideas of several generations of eminent researchers but is also consistent within itself, comprehensive and as simple as possible.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resolution of Maslov's paradox lets us state that building the explanatory and predictive model of the Russian aspect becomes possible if to recognise that the category of aspect has the only one unit and the unit is the two-term (binary) aspectual paradigm. We suppose that results described in (Samedova, 2011a;Samedova, 2013a-b;Samedova, 2015;Samedova, 2016;Samedova, 2018a-b;Samedova, 2019;Samedova, 2020) also allow thinking that the theory we work within can effectively respond to challenges posed by Slavic-type aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of Maslov's paradox lets us state that building the explanatory and predictive model of the Russian aspect becomes possible if to recognise that the category of aspect has the only one unit and the unit is the two-term (binary) aspectual paradigm. We suppose that results described in (Samedova, 2011a;Samedova, 2013a-b;Samedova, 2015;Samedova, 2016;Samedova, 2018a-b;Samedova, 2019;Samedova, 2020) also allow thinking that the theory we work within can effectively respond to challenges posed by Slavic-type aspect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers also study the linguistic world image of space and its cultural specificity (Croft & Cruse 2004;Fauconnier 1997;Hebert & Feist 2017;Taylor 1995), analyze spatial words and concepts that constitute the category of space (Clausner & Croft 1999;De Knop 2016;Evans 2006;Izutsu 2016;Lin 2017;Samedova 2016;Stefanowitsch 2013;Vis 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%