1967
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(67)90014-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal and pictorial facilitation of paired-associate learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

1969
1969
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fact-learning literature, there is evidence that a subject's own elaborations are better retained than those provided by the experimenter (e.g., Bobrow & Bower, 1969;Rohwer& Ammon, 1971;Rohwer, Lynch, Levin, & Suzuki, 1967;Rohwer, Lynch, Suzuki, & Levin, 1967). Nonetheless, we suspectthat in a skill-learning domain, reader-generatedelaborations will be less reliable than those the author can provide.…”
Section: Why Do Author-provided Elaborations Impede Fact Learning?mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the fact-learning literature, there is evidence that a subject's own elaborations are better retained than those provided by the experimenter (e.g., Bobrow & Bower, 1969;Rohwer& Ammon, 1971;Rohwer, Lynch, Levin, & Suzuki, 1967;Rohwer, Lynch, Suzuki, & Levin, 1967). Nonetheless, we suspectthat in a skill-learning domain, reader-generatedelaborations will be less reliable than those the author can provide.…”
Section: Why Do Author-provided Elaborations Impede Fact Learning?mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…(147) j Milgram (192) j Rohwer et ai. (240,241)]. While it has been shown that context has most of its facilitating effect at the storage rather than retrieval end of the experimental sequence [Rohwer,Shuell & Levin (242)], the nature of the mediating process re sponsible for this effect is stilI far from clear.…”
Section: Cognitive Processesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It has been suggested that verbal context serves as an aid in inducing imagery [Reese and Lipsitt, 1970, p. 215;R eese, 1970b;Paivio, 1970], that facilitation in the case of imagery is the result of encoding into verbal form [Milgram, 1967b], and that the verbal and visual systems are independent, although with many interconnections [Bower, 1970], D avidson and Adams [1970] note that developmentally one process might precede the other, and so one might still ask which is more effective at different ages. Efforts to discover age trends in visual and verbal effects have generally not been successful, how ever [Reese, 1970a;Rohwer et al, 1967]. Presentation of stimuli in visual form does lead to better recall for young children than presentation in verbal form [Dilley and Paivio, 1968;, particularly if the items are presented in a unitized or compounded form [Reese, 1965[Reese, , 1970aD avidson and Adams, 1970].…”
Section: Visual and Verbal Elaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This particular variable has been further investigated by Horowitz et al [1969] and by Bencomo et al [1971], who have demonstrated better recall for a missing object if it is originally presented as part of a unitized scene rather than as part of a serial presentation. Presentation of stimulus and response terms within verbal contexts can also lead to better recall of the appropriate items, particularly when the words used are concrete or otherwise image-evoking [Paivio and Yuille, 1966;Yuille and Pritchard, 1969;Paivio, 1970], and when the sentences employed as context contain prepositions [Davidson and Adams, 1970] and verbs [Rohwer et al, 1967] rather than conjunctions. Jensen and Rohwer [1965] induced subjects to construct their own sentences using the stimulus and response items in a paired-as sociate task, and found that this facilitated recall for children between 7 and 11 years of age.…”
Section: Visual and Verbal Elaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%