2008
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.21471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular shape biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in clinical MR images

Abstract: The aim of this work was to identify ventricular shape-based biomarkers in MR images to discriminate between patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) and healthy elderly. Clinical MR images were collected for 58 patients and 28 age-matched healthy controls. After normalizing all the images the ventricular cerebrospinal fluid was semiautomatically extracted for each subject and an innovative technique for fully automatic shape modeling was applied to generate comparable meshes of all ventri

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ferrarini et al [6] focus on the ventricular shape. Based on a shape model, surface nodes significantly related to the presence of AD are selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ferrarini et al [6] focus on the ventricular shape. Based on a shape model, surface nodes significantly related to the presence of AD are selected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important example is a small hippocampal volume, which has consistently been found to be an early biomarker of dementia [2][3][4]. Other brain structures whose shapes have been related to dementia are the amygdala [3], the putamen and thalamus [5], and the ventricles [6]. The brain structure under consideration needs to be delineated accurately, in order to be useful as a biomarker for dementia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, variation in ventricle shape is frequently modelled using SSMs, with shape being represented either as landmarks on the ventricular surface [Graham et al, 2006;Narr et al, 2001], as multiple central points and surface-to-core radial measurements [Chou et al, 2007;, or as spherical harmonics [Gerig et al, 2001;Styner et al, 2003]. Typically, these studies construct separate models of healthy and enlarged ventricular shape [Ferrarini et al, 2006;Ferrarini et al, 2008a], in order to identify significant shape differences. However this requires machine learning approaches, such as the SelfOrganised Map (SOM) [Kohonen, 1990] and Support Vector Machines (SVM) [Cortes and Vapnik, 1995], to find point correspondence between the two models, and to classify ventricles based on trained shape features, respectively.…”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Subcortical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewed studies use the SSM method to construct separate healthy and pathologic models to ascertain shape differences between the cohorts [Ferrarini et al, 2008a;Gerig et al, 2001;Thompson et al, 2004]. Unlike degenerative pathologies, developmental disturbances cause highly irregular changes in ventricular shape [Truwit et al, 1992].…”
Section: Shape Analysis Of Subcortical Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation