2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity structure of the earthquake zone of the M6.3 Yogyakarta earthquake 2006 from a seismic tomography study

Abstract: On 2006 May 26 at 23:54 UTC, a moderate shallow crustal earthquake with a moment magnitude of 6.3 occurred in the southern part of Yogyakarta in Java, Indonesia. The earthquake caused severe damages in the area in addition to over 5700 casualties. The cause of this earthquake was initially believed to have been a rupture on the northeast-southwest trending Opak Fault; however, the role of this fault in the earthquake continues to be debated. Therefore, this study presents a subsurface model constructed to char… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The focal mechanism model for the mainshock and aftershock of the Yogyakarta earthquake suggest that the Opak's river fault was not the source (Fukuoka et al, 2006;Diambama et al, 2019;and Nakano, et al, 2006). The gravity study in the Yogyakarta earthquake zone by Irham et al, 2014also supported this result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focal mechanism model for the mainshock and aftershock of the Yogyakarta earthquake suggest that the Opak's river fault was not the source (Fukuoka et al, 2006;Diambama et al, 2019;and Nakano, et al, 2006). The gravity study in the Yogyakarta earthquake zone by Irham et al, 2014also supported this result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focal mechanism model for the mainshock and aftershock of the Yogyakarta earthquake suggest that the Opak's river fault was not the source (Fukuoka et al, 2006;Diambama et al, 2019;and Nakano, et al, 2006). The gravity study in the Yogyakarta earthquake zone by Irham et al, 2014 also supported this result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they ocassionally disregard the potential hazard since the choices are limited if they can choose where to live (Lewerissa et al, 2017). Under such circumstance, challenges and opportunities present themselves in terms of the tsunami risk management in Indonesia (Diambama, Anggraini, Nukman, & Lühr, 2018). The first challenge is "how to minimize the tsunami risk in all areas?…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%