16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013) 2013
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2013.6728283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle type classification from laser scanner profiles: A benchmark of feature descriptors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in the previous evaluation [17], all methods show a similar performance in terms of per-vehicle accuracy. It reflects the biased class distribution observed in the current tolling system installation.…”
Section: B Vehicle Type Classification Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Like in the previous evaluation [17], all methods show a similar performance in terms of per-vehicle accuracy. It reflects the biased class distribution observed in the current tolling system installation.…”
Section: B Vehicle Type Classification Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…• Raw: The raw profile features normalized to a 15x15 grid. • FIS: Fisher image signatures as described in [17]. Two sets of global and raw features are available after the pre-processing step.…”
Section: B Vehicle Type Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To address the space shift and scaling problem, the dynamic time warping (DTW) [107] and the global alignment kernel (GA) [108] are used. The same six vehicle types as [87] were used for experiments. The best classification accuracy achieved was 86.8%.…”
Section: Privacy Preserving Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%