17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/itsc.2014.6958145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle type classification from laser scans with global alignment kernels

Abstract: This paper addresses the problem of vehicle classification using laser scanner profiles, which is usually found as a component of electronic tolling systems. Laser scanners obtain a 3D measurement of the vehicle surface. Previous approaches treated the laser scans as images. In addition to high-level features (such as width, height, length and other measurements) from the scanner profiles, feature descriptors have been used for supervised classification of laser scanner profiles. This allowed to deploy a gener… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Sandhawalia, Rodriguez-Serrano, Poirier & Csurka, 2013) proposes a comparison between three different features but using a linear classifier engine; this work reports the following classification rates for each type of feature: Raw Profiles Features 79.93%, Fisher Laser Signatures 70.52%, and Fisher Image Signatures 83.04%. (Chidlovskii, Csurka & Rodriguez-Serrano, 2014)…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(Sandhawalia, Rodriguez-Serrano, Poirier & Csurka, 2013) proposes a comparison between three different features but using a linear classifier engine; this work reports the following classification rates for each type of feature: Raw Profiles Features 79.93%, Fisher Laser Signatures 70.52%, and Fisher Image Signatures 83.04%. (Chidlovskii, Csurka & Rodriguez-Serrano, 2014)…”
Section: Classification Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, the average rate classification performances for the FPFH, SHOT and NARF descriptors were 84.52%, 81.5% and 79.18% respectively, which are comparable with current state of the art methods. Other AVC systems focus on increasing feature descriptiveness or having powerful classifiers, which is the case of (Urazghildiiev, Ragnarsson, Ridderstrom, Rydberg, Ojefors, Wallin, Enochsson, Ericson, & Lofqvist, 2007), (Sandhawalia, Rodriguez-Serrano, Poirier & Csurka, 2013) and (Chidlovskii, Csurka & Rodriguez-Serrano, 2014). This work was conceived enhancing both using high descriptive point cloud features and high generalization capability on classifier.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser scanner is used to take the shapes of vehicles via a calculated depth map [43]. Laser scanners based on ToF or the phase-shift principle are more expensive than cameras, and laser scanners produce data of lower quality than cameras [41].…”
Section: Laser Scannermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important problem is the driver privacy concerns as there are many people who do not feel comfortable to be exposed to cameras. Some overroadway-based systems address the privacy concerns by adopting different types of sensors such as infrared sensors [26] and laser scanner [31].…”
Section: Taxonomy Of Vehicle Classification Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another laser scanner-based approach is developed by Chidlovskii et al [31]. The key contribution of this vehicle classification system in comparison with [87] is to utilize the specific domain knowledge, i.e., the vehicle shapes to enhance the classification accuracy.…”
Section: Privacy Preserving Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%