2010
DOI: 10.1541/ieejias.130.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle Motion Control Method Using Yaw-moment Observer and Lateral Force Observer for Electric Vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a vehicle control method [16] in which a lateral force observer (LFO) was designed for the vehicle sideslip angle control and a yaw moment observer (YMO) was used for the yaw rate control. We used a vehicle control method [16] in which a lateral force observer (LFO) was designed for the vehicle sideslip angle control and a yaw moment observer (YMO) was used for the yaw rate control.…”
Section: Control System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a vehicle control method [16] in which a lateral force observer (LFO) was designed for the vehicle sideslip angle control and a yaw moment observer (YMO) was used for the yaw rate control. We used a vehicle control method [16] in which a lateral force observer (LFO) was designed for the vehicle sideslip angle control and a yaw moment observer (YMO) was used for the yaw rate control.…”
Section: Control System Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there is a "trade-off" between sideslip angle control and yaw rate control. In [11,16], and [17], active front steering is integrated with direct yaw moment control by different schemes. In [11], decoupling control method is utilized such that sideslip angle is controlled by front steering angle and yaw rate is controlled by yaw moment.…”
Section: Upper Control Layer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It means the decoupling terms are designed in the upper control layer. As discussed in [16] and [17], the decoupling control is not robust enough under the variation of cornering stiffness. In case of big cornering stiffness error, i.e., 30% of the true value, the state responses will have a terrible oscillation about the desired values.…”
Section: Upper Control Layer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations