2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation and longitudinal coarse sediment connectivity affect the ability of ecosystem restoration to reduce riverbank erosion and turbidity in drinking water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
(119 reference statements)
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The presence of vegetation in an area, especially water catchment, is noted to reduce runoffs and soil erosion, thereby reducing turbidity. This has been confirmed by a recent study by McMahon et al (2020) that vegetation could reduce riverbank erosion, and therefore contribute to reducing turbidity.…”
Section: Water Quality and Lulcc In The Nawuni Catchmentsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The presence of vegetation in an area, especially water catchment, is noted to reduce runoffs and soil erosion, thereby reducing turbidity. This has been confirmed by a recent study by McMahon et al (2020) that vegetation could reduce riverbank erosion, and therefore contribute to reducing turbidity.…”
Section: Water Quality and Lulcc In The Nawuni Catchmentsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…When we analyzed the PFF together with land use, we noticed that areas where the basin presented high erosive potential were accompanied by an absence of native vegetation, resulting in lower ESI. According to McMahon et al [57], this relationship between the inclination of the slope and vegetation intervenes in the dynamic effects of the slope; indeed, areas that present larger declivities with an absence of vegetation are predisposed to erosive processes. The consequences of erosion include the pollution of water bodies and wetlands and the reduction of agricultural land productivity, thereby degrading natural resources and negatively influencing the HDF [58].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, in an aesthetical issue, the vegetation may also provide financial benefits [91], and it is observed that the riparian inhabitants will mostly prefer vegetative cover than visually intrusive concrete or stone riprap [56,92]. • T3: Vegetation-based techniques [93,94] offer a natural healing process to the stream [64,95], positively impacting (as previously mentioned in the description of the group of techniques T2) on water quality, wildlife habitat, flood reduction, the aesthetic value of a stream and financial valuation of the riparian regions [57,58,64,87,88,[95][96][97]. Furthermore, the physical vegetative coverage on streambanks protects the soil according to the combined effects of roots, stems, and foliage [61].…”
Section: Alternatives: Interventional Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%