Vécu de la pandémie et plasticité du logement

Clément, Garance; Daffe, Laurie; Fritz, Livia

doi:10.3917/rpsf.141.0069

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Restaurants, non-essential shops, cultural places, sports and leisure facilities were closed, and working from home was mandatory at the time. This context has to be taken into account in the interpretation of the results as the pandemic experience had consequences on home-making (e.g., see Clément et al 2021 housing plasticity during the pandemic). Indeed, even though it was repeatedly mentioned in the questionnaire to relate to a “normal” situation and to remain within the context of “usual” daily life, some questions relating to aspirations, ideals, projections, or feelings may have been influenced by the confinement situation.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Domotopia: introduction to the quantitative survey

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper describes the Data Domotopia a 2300 + respondent self-administered web-based survey. It includes 100 + multi-purpose items about home-making and stillness in a moving world. We suppose that home-making can reveal coping strategies and resilience practices to make everyday life work – as home is a central location in people’s activity-travel patterns. To describe this phenomenon, the concept of Domotopia is introduced, defining how people arrange, use, and experience their homes to cope with the pathologies of accelerated and liquid modernity (Bauman 2005). While the Data Domotopia is based on a mixed-method combining qualitative and quantitative material, this paper focuses mainly on the description of the questionnaire – which is organized into three interrelated layers: the dwelling, the dwellers, and the neighborhood. Each of these layers unfolds in functional, social, emotional and sensory components. The survey covers most of the contemporary issues related to home-making. This includes the domestic space and gender issues; the socio-spatial resources (mobility, action space, core, and wider social network); lifestyles, ideals, and residential aspiration; time pressures, time use, organization and stress; equipment, rules and arrangements; interpersonal relations, cohabitation and negotiation, dominance and power. Intakes on the Data Domotopia is given by two concrete cases about the time-space coverage of the habitual action space, and about inter-personal task allocation. These examples show the potential of the data to study domocentric stillness and resilience to urban pathologies. The data – aggregated to the infra-communal level – is available for research purposes.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data Domotopia: introduction to the quantitative survey

et al. 2023

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Soothing house. How housing does mitigate time pressures?

Drevon,

Schultheiss,

Kaufmann

et al. 2024

Cities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Explore, engage, empower: methodological insights into a transformative mixed methods study tackling the COVID-19 lockdown

Fritz

Vilsmaier

Clément

et al. 2022

Humanit Soc Sci Commun

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Action-oriented, transformative, and transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly heralded as promising tools that enable researchers not only to produce new knowledge about a situation, but also to actively engage in tackling it; however, such approaches raise critical questions about the methodological implications and conflicts involved in pursuing multiple objectives concurrently. This article seeks to advance this debate by examining the methodological implications of pursuing both knowledge production-oriented (epistemic) and action-oriented (transformative) objectives in urgent and uncertain situations. It asks how far a transformative mixed methods research design can leverage the potential of research to achieve multiple objectives in times of crisis. This methodological inquiry is based on a transformative mixed methods study on housing conditions and well-being which was initiated during the first COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland. The study was composed of a country-wide survey, mobile crowdsourcing, interviews and Citizen Think Tanks. The results of this methodological reflection illustrate how this research design made it possible to (i) explore the effects of the crisis on domestic living spaces, (ii) engage with the crisis in a joint research space, and (iii) stimulate empowerment through reflection and mutual learning. These insights suggest the multidimensional orientation of the transformative mixed methods approach is appropriate for acting upon urgent crises. However, it challenges core methodological values and research constellations including (i) tackling unequal engagement opportunities, (ii) navigating social and epistemic control, and (iii) paying attention to situatedness and positionality. The article concludes that, in anticipation of future crises, favorable conditions for multi-targeted, collaborative research need to be fostered, both on the institutional and on personal levels. These conditions should enable fast and adequate team formation, as well as reflection and negotiation of positionalities, and divergent interests and objectives, of both scientists and citizens.

show abstract

Vécu de la pandémie et plasticité du logement

Cited by 6 publications

References 9 publications

Data Domotopia: introduction to the quantitative survey

Data Domotopia: introduction to the quantitative survey

Soothing house. How housing does mitigate time pressures?

Explore, engage, empower: methodological insights into a transformative mixed methods study tackling the COVID-19 lockdown

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About