The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00003957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vat incubator with immersion core illumination — a new, inexpensive setup for mass phytoplankton culture

Abstract: One of the shortcomings in studies of bivalve grazing has been the difficulty of culturing and making available sufficient quantities of algae. This was overcome using a 250 1 capacity vat incubator with immersion core illumination (VIICI) in connection with experiments involving the diatom Nitzschia pungens f. multiseries, which produces domoic acid, the cause of amnesic shellfish poisoning. Nitzschia cultures grown in this incubator yielded maximum cell concentrations of 158-166 x 106 cells 1-, a peak intrac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the proposed model provides a useful tool for the analysis of various configurations of internally radiating photobioreactors. For example, Ogbonna et al (1996) located four internal radiators symmetrically at the midpoint between the reactor center and the reactor inner surface, but Wohlgeschaffen et al (1992) located all four radiators at the circumscribed position. Although it is difficult to make a direct comparison of their light transfer efficiencies, due to differences in light sources, reactor dimensions, and microorganisms used, our simulation results indicate that locating the four radiators at the midpoint give higher light energy than those at the circumscribed position.…”
Section: Application To Other Internally Radiating Photobioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the proposed model provides a useful tool for the analysis of various configurations of internally radiating photobioreactors. For example, Ogbonna et al (1996) located four internal radiators symmetrically at the midpoint between the reactor center and the reactor inner surface, but Wohlgeschaffen et al (1992) located all four radiators at the circumscribed position. Although it is difficult to make a direct comparison of their light transfer efficiencies, due to differences in light sources, reactor dimensions, and microorganisms used, our simulation results indicate that locating the four radiators at the midpoint give higher light energy than those at the circumscribed position.…”
Section: Application To Other Internally Radiating Photobioreactorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, to reduce the loss of light energy outside the photobioreactor, several designs of internally radiating photobioreactors have been developed. These employ optical fibers (Javanmardian and Palsson, 1991;Matsunaga et al, 1991;Mori, 1985), fluorescent lamps (Ogbonna et al, 1996;Pohl et al, 1988;Radmer et al, 1987;Takano et al, 1995;Wohlgeschaffen et al, 1992), or light-emitting plates or tubes (Csögör et al, 1999;Hirata et al, 1996). However, no indepth study on modeling and interpreting the irradiance conditions inside internally radiating photobioreactors has been conducted.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Although both of these issues can be resolved, the cost of doing so can more than offset the cost advantage of using natural sunlight. As with the outdoor systems, numerous designs have been constructed for the indoor, closed culture of algae using electric lights for illumination (Ratchford and Fallowfi eld 1992 ;Wohlgeschaffen et al 1992 ;Iqbal et al 1993 ;Lee and Palsson 1994 ). These vessels are often referred to as photobioreactors, and in principle, they are similar to conventional fermentor, the major difference being that they are driven by light rather than by an organic carbon source.…”
Section: Phototrophic Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several designs have been developed for closed (indoor) cultivation of photosynthetic microorganisms which utilize artificial light as source of energy (Ratchford and Fallowfield, 1992;Wohlgeschaffen et al, 1992;Lee and Palsson, 1994). These designs/vessels are similar to conventional fermenters in principle and are referred to as photobioreactors; however, these photobioreactors are driven by light unlike the fermenters, which are driven by an organic carbon source ( Figure 3C).…”
Section: Cultivation Using Artificial Light In Closed Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%