2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-014-0855-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vasopressin receptor antagonists for the treatment of heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract: Vasopressin receptors antagonists may reduce body weight and increase Na but do not improve all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or kidney function. In addition, acceptability of long-term treatment side effects and hospitalization appears problematic.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although previous RCTs and systematic reviews [ 7 10 ] reported treatment benefits of tolvaptan on patients with CHF, the optimal dosage remains unclear. This is because traditional meta-analysis can only make pairwise comparisons and is not well suited to compare multiple treatments, such as different dosages of the same drug.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although previous RCTs and systematic reviews [ 7 10 ] reported treatment benefits of tolvaptan on patients with CHF, the optimal dosage remains unclear. This is because traditional meta-analysis can only make pairwise comparisons and is not well suited to compare multiple treatments, such as different dosages of the same drug.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, vaptans have demonstrated an effect on [Na + ] serum [ 47 , 48 ], but no systematic review and meta-analysis has confirmed the clinical impact of this effect in both worsening HF [ 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 ] and cirrhotic ascites [ 54 , 55 , 56 ]. Importantly, although these drugs are used after water restriction and diuretics, only some molecules have been studied clinically, and only two vaptans are actually used in the clinic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, these findings of TLV are not attributed to the hemodynamics, but they are due to the effects of neurohormonal factors induced by vasopressin. The effectiveness of the long-term use of TLV in all HF patients was denied by the large-scale EVEREST trial and a meta-analysis (19, 20). Similarly, conivaptan, a V1a and V2 receptor antagonist that is approved only in the USA, shows no long-term benefits (21).…”
Section: Vasopressin and Chronic Hfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety and effectiveness of using TLV for children has been reported as well (48), so hypernatremia may be able to be avoided by the long-term use of TLV if we identify groups at high risk of hypernatremia and initiate TLV at relatively low doses, such as 3.75 mg/day. Although a meta-analysis reported in 2017 that TLV was not associated with an increased risk of adverse events (49), one report has claimed that the long-term use of TLV increased the risk of adverse events by 14% (20). The risk of adverse events should be evaluated when considering the continued use of TLV (especially in the long term).…”
Section: Safety Of Tlvmentioning
confidence: 99%