Varying the Order of Combinations of Single- and Multi-Joint Exercises Differentially Affects Resistance Training Adaptations

Abstract

Brandão, L, de Salles Painelli, V, Lasevicius, T, Silva-Batista, C, Brendon, H, Schoenfeld, BJ, Aihara, AY, Cardoso, FN, de Almeida Peres, B, and Teixeira, EL. Varying the order of combinations of single- and multi-joint exercises differentially affects resistance training adaptations. J Strength Cond Res 34(5): 1254–1263, 2020—Our study aimed to compare the effects of multi-joint (MJ) and single-joint (SJ) exercises, either isolated or in combination, and in different orders, on cross-sectional area (CSA) of the pectoralis major (PM) and different heads of the triceps brachii (TB), as well as on the one-repetition maximum (1-RM) in the bench press and lying barbell triceps press. Forty-three young men were randomly assigned to one of 4 possible RT protocols: barbell bench press plus lying barbell triceps press (MJ + SJ, n = 12); lying barbell triceps press plus barbell bench press (SJ + MJ, n = 10); barbell bench press (MJ, n = 10); or lying barbell triceps press (SJ, n = 11). Results showed significant within-group increases in 1-RM bench press for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ but not for SJ. Conversely, significantly greater within-group increases in elbow extension 1-RM were noted for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ but not for MJ. Significantly greater increases in PM CSA were observed for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with SJ. Significant increases in TB CSA were noted for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ, but not for MJ, without observed between-group differences. Individual analysis of TB heads showed significantly greater CSA increases in the lateral head for MJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with SJ. Alternatively, significantly greater increases in the long head were observed for SJ, MJ + SJ, and SJ + MJ compared with MJ. CSA increases for the medial head were statistically similar between conditions. Our findings indicate that muscular adaptations are differentially affected by performance of MJ and SJ exercises.

Training Programs Designed for Muscle Hypertrophy in Bodybuilders: A Narrative Review

“…Therefore, classic resistance training periodization is not always strictly observed, and specific biomechanical strategies are employed, albeit empirically, to obtain hypertrophic responses from specific muscle groups. In fact, the indiscriminate gain in muscle volume does not seem interesting for this population, given that intra and intermuscular hypertrophy responds differently to different exercise modalities [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 ].…”

Resistance Training Recommendations to Maximize Muscle Hypertrophy in an Athletic Population: Position Stand of the IUSCA

“…Combining multi-and single-joint exercise appears to confer a synergistic effect to foster complete development of the musculature. Brandao et al (153) found that performance of the bench press (multi-joint exercise) led to the greatest increase in cross-sectional area of the lateral head of the triceps brachii whereas performance of the lying triceps extension (single-joint exercise) elicited the greatest increase in the long head over a 10-week training period; the combination of the single-and multi-joint exercises produced the greatest overall increase in cross-sectional area of the triceps brachii as a whole. Similar conclusions can be inferred indirectly from the literature for the thigh musculature.…”

Effects of Cross-Education After 6 Weeks of Eccentric Single-Leg Decline Squats Performed With Different Execution Times: A Randomized Controlled Trial

“…In our research, the SLDS e exercise stimulated the participation of all the muscles of the lower extremity as well as the stabilizing muscles of the hip and lumbar and dorsal spine. This extensive participation of the involved muscles may have caused an increase in the secretion of anabolic hormones such as testosterone or growth hormone 11 provoking the endocrine response triggered by exercise and its effects on the maintenance of muscle mass in the untrained limb. 26 Furthermore, some research has proposed that eccentric training performed at high intensities is the most effective training mode to promote muscle growth, 20 and these phenomena may justify the increase in the lean mass of the contralateral untrained limb.…”