Varieties of Inclusionary Populism? SYRIZA, Podemos and the Five Star Movement

Abstract

Over the past years, parties often described as populist, such as SYRIZA in Greece, the Five Star Movement (FSM) in Italy and Podemos in Spain have made significant electoral breakthroughs, unsettling well-established party systems. In the literature, inclusionary populism has primarily been applied to Latin America whereas the three Southern European parties have been examined individually, but not in comparative perspective. The purpose of this article is to provide a comparative analysis, based on an original electoral manifestos content analysis, aimed at unveiling the ‘inclusionary populism’ features of the ‘new’ political parties that have emerged in Southern Europe. By focusing on the 2012–16 period, the article shows that the inclusionary category can be fruitfully applied also to European political parties; it finds different degrees of inclusionary populism (namely between SYRIZA and Podemos); and it proves that the FSM falls between the two exclusionary vs. inclusionary poles.

Varieties of Populist Parties and Party Systems in Europe: From State-of-the-Art to the Application of a Novel Classification Scheme to 66 Parties in 33 Countries

“…In ‘positional’ terms, my conception of ‘left’ and ‘right’ follows Norberto Bobbio's (1996) approach in defining it in terms of relative propensity towards egalitarianism, an understanding that, in my view, also includes but does not correspond tout court to the distinction between ‘inclusionary’ and ‘exclusionary’ populism (cf. Font et al 2019; Mudde and Rovira Kaltwasser 2013).…”

Getting the Problem Definition Right: The Radical Right, Populism, Nativism and Public Health Comment on "A Scoping Review of Populist Radical Right Parties’ Influence on Welfare Policy and its Implications for Population Health in Europe"

“…First of all, it obscures the fact that the ideological core of PRR politics is nativism, and not populism. 4 Secondly, the use of the term 'populism' per se tends to conflate radical right and radical left populisms, ignoring the ideological divide between such left and right types of populist politics -a cleavage that clearly shows in the difference between the exclusionary welfare chauvinism of the right and the 'inclusionary populist' approach to welfare of the left. 5 And thirdly, labelling the PRR as simply 'populist' tends to conceptually conflate populism with exclusionary ethnic nationalism (or nativism), seeing the exclusion of national 'others' as intrinsic to populism.…”

Populism and Electoral Politics in New Zealand

“…When mapped globally, varieties of populism can also be found across the range of the widely identified second dimension of party competition: from conservative, traditionalist, authoritarian or parochial values, at one end, to cosmopolitan, liberal and multicultural values, at the other (Norris & Inglehart, 2019). 'The people' are defined narrowly or broadly, across different dimensions (Abts & Rummens, 2007;Font, Graziano & Tsakatika, 2019;Stanley, 2008, p. 107). In contrast to standard accounts of populist movements and leaders delineating a homogenous 'people', inclusionary populism (e.g.…”