2010
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1664112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varieties of Clientelism: Machine Politics During Elections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
80
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
80
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…58 This is consistent with what GansMorse et al call ''turnout buying,'' whereby ''clientelist parties'' use a range of strategies to activate their passive constituencies rather than induce vote switching. 59 In Kenya, Kramon also found empirical corroboration from survey data that votebuying had a significant effect on increasing turnout. 60 …”
Section: Journal Of Eastern African Studies 537mentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…58 This is consistent with what GansMorse et al call ''turnout buying,'' whereby ''clientelist parties'' use a range of strategies to activate their passive constituencies rather than induce vote switching. 59 In Kenya, Kramon also found empirical corroboration from survey data that votebuying had a significant effect on increasing turnout. 60 …”
Section: Journal Of Eastern African Studies 537mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…57 Contrary to the expectation that turnout would be lower in areas where the NRM has traditionally dominated (as it is typically more difficult to mobilize when victory appears assured), Museveni grew his share of the vote as participation levels increased, while a majority of voters stayed away from the polls in opposition strongholds such as Kampala. 58 This is consistent with what GansMorse et al call ''turnout buying,'' whereby ''clientelist parties'' use a range of strategies to activate their passive constituencies rather than induce vote switching.…”
Section: Journal Of Eastern African Studies 537mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In some cases, exit costs are prohibitive. When parties have programmatic linkages to voters (Kitschelt ), agents may still be relevant for mobilizing supporters (Gans‐Morse, Mazzuca, and Nichter ; Nichter ), but efforts to swing voters could prove fruitless or too expensive for these agents. For example, in ethnically diverse societies, voters may suspect local ethnic leaders WHO are brokering votes for politicians of a different ethnic group (Baldwin ; Chandra ; Corstange ; Koter ), and agents can anticipate that changing parties would make them lose their grip with supporters, and relevance to parties.…”
Section: Brokers: An Unreliable Channel To Votersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Algunos autores definen al gasto en bienes privados o particularistas, particularmente al gasto en personal o empleo público, como patronazgo (patronage) Murillo, 2004;Melo;Pereira, 2013;Remmer, 2007;Robinson;Verdier, 2013;Van den Walle, 2007). Mientras que otros lo denominan como gasto clientelar (Carneiro, 2009;Gans-Morse;Mazzuca;Nichter, 2014;Kitschelt;Wilkinson, 2007;Magaloni;Díaz-Cayeros;Estevez, 2007;Stokes, 2007;Zarazaga, 2014) o compra de votos Stokes, 2004;Nichter, 2008), que es aquel que involucra el uso de recursos públicos (típicamente empleo públi-co) a cambio de apoyo electoral. Debido a la complejidad para observar los intercambios entre políticos entregando recursos públicos y votantes apoyándolos electoralmente, y para evitar las dificultades de medir clientelismo, una parte de la literatura ha tratado de definir y comparar el gasto del gobierno en distintos bienes y servicios (Weitz-Shapiro, 2012, p. 569).…”
Section: Definicionesunclassified