2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of midline facial soft tissue thicknesses among three skeletal classes in Central Anatolian adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
17
0
13

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
4
17
0
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the results are difficult to discuss, as literature concerning the children is very limited; nevertheless, provide some food for thoughts. First, general rules concerning adults seem not to be entirely followed in case of children, as Class II shows lower thicknesses in labrale superius; from this point of view, the present data are concordant with several articles on adult population, where this specific difference has already been reported [13,15,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, the results are difficult to discuss, as literature concerning the children is very limited; nevertheless, provide some food for thoughts. First, general rules concerning adults seem not to be entirely followed in case of children, as Class II shows lower thicknesses in labrale superius; from this point of view, the present data are concordant with several articles on adult population, where this specific difference has already been reported [13,15,17].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…On the other side, in a similar Turkish population Kamak and Celikoglu [15] found a statistically significant increase of soft tissue thickness at labrale superius and stomion in Class III, at labrale inferius in Class II. Gungor et al, [17] in a Central Anatolian group found differences in soft tissue thicknesses at rhinion, labrale superius (higher in Class III) and labrale inferius (higher in Class II) in males, and at nasion and labrale inferius in females (higher in Class II).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The influence of skeletal class on ASTD has been explored from lateral cephalograms in numerous ways, including manual acetate sheet tracing [35][36][37][38][39]41,44,45,47], digital measurement using iTEM Analyses imaging program [42], DentaPacs 8.1 [43], Sidexis Xg [40], NemoCeph NS [46], and Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 (this study). Nevertheless, the ASTD among three skeletal classes of the Indonesian adult population was found comparable with the previous studies from other ancestral groups (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous studies providing ASTD data based on sex, age, ancestral origin and body mass index (BMI) which are derived from various sample sources for instance cadavers [6][7][8][9][10], ultrasound [11][12][13][14][15][16][17], magnetic resonance imaging scans [18][19][20][21], computed tomography scans [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31], cone beam computed tomography [32][33][34], and lateral cephalograms [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Interestingly, some papers have found that skeletal classes influences the ASTD pattern in the oral area, both in subadult [35][36][37][39][40]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature related to facial soft tissue thickness are often analyzed with the separation of sexes [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50], specifically to nose prediction, Rynn et al [13] and Sarilita et al [35] both suggested significant sexual dimorphism.…”
Section: Rynn Et Al Suggested Nasal Height and Nasal Depth For Europmentioning
confidence: 99%