2020
DOI: 10.4314/ijma.v2i14.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations of finger dermatoglyphics among the Esan ethnic group of Edo State, Nigeria

Abstract: Patterns in fingers, palms, and soles; a term refers to as ‘dermatoglyphics’, are now been studied for ethno-historic facts and ancestry tracing. However, there is paucity of information on Esan people dermatoglyphics. Hence, this study investigates the variations in finger dermatoglyphics among Esan speaking tribe of Edo State, Nigeria. A total of 500 indigenes were sampled from 3 randomly selected Local Government Areas (LGAs) and the ink method was used to collect finger-prints from both palms. The loop was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An earlier study suggested that the use of dermal ridges formation or total ridge count as markers in population studies and phylogenetic analysis to be greatly influenced by certain parameters such as the geographical location, the ethnic background and the language (Sharma, Gautam, & Tiwari, 2007). In contrast to most of the earlier studies (Sandhu et al ., 2017; Patil et al ., 2019; Chaudhary et al ., 2017; Kc et al ., 2018), in the present study gender influence on the distribution of fingerprint pattern was observed, and it was in accordance with an earlier study (Anyanwu, 2020). This influence manifested by having the whorl pattern (50.0%) being the most dominant among male participants, whereas among the female participants it was the loop pattern (54.6%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…An earlier study suggested that the use of dermal ridges formation or total ridge count as markers in population studies and phylogenetic analysis to be greatly influenced by certain parameters such as the geographical location, the ethnic background and the language (Sharma, Gautam, & Tiwari, 2007). In contrast to most of the earlier studies (Sandhu et al ., 2017; Patil et al ., 2019; Chaudhary et al ., 2017; Kc et al ., 2018), in the present study gender influence on the distribution of fingerprint pattern was observed, and it was in accordance with an earlier study (Anyanwu, 2020). This influence manifested by having the whorl pattern (50.0%) being the most dominant among male participants, whereas among the female participants it was the loop pattern (54.6%).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…A study conducted in Bulgaria demonstrated that loop pattern was significantly higher across the right hand fingers (), while another study in China demonstrated that the loop fingerprint pattern was the most dominant pattern across the left hand fingers (Heng et al, 2018). In Northern Taiwan, men have a higher frequency of whorls and women typically exhibiting more loops and arches (Shehu et al, 2018) which is similar to a study in Nigeria which demonstrated that the frequency of whorl and arches was higher in male and females respectively (Anyanwu, 2020). However, higher frequency of radial loops and ulnar loops was reported in males and females, respectively, in Nepal (Shrestha & Malla, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These findings are similar to those reported by Fayrouz NE et al in 2012 [10], Shrestha I et al in 2019 [11], and Anyanwu LC et al in 2020. [12] The present study reports whorls (21, 43.8%) as the most common fingerprint pattern in males, followed by loops (19, 39.6%) and arches (8, 16.7%), while in females, the most common pattern was loops (68, 44.7%), followed by whorls (60, 39.5%), and the least common pattern was arches (24, 15.5%). These results are in accordance with the studies by Nithin MD et al [13] and Patil A et al [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 44%