2013
DOI: 10.1080/10429247.2013.11431971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Risk Management Models: A Comparative Study of the Space Shuttle Challenger Disasters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A certain probability interval can be used instead of the precise probability value, the probability of the bottom event is represented by a fuzzy number, and the probability of the occurrence of the top event is calculated by fuzzy mathematical arithmetic (Zhao and Gong 2001). The advantage of this method is that the language used to evaluate events allows errors within a certain range so that a relatively accurate probability of occurrence of the fault tree top events can be obtained (Altabbakh et al 2013).…”
Section: Basic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A certain probability interval can be used instead of the precise probability value, the probability of the bottom event is represented by a fuzzy number, and the probability of the occurrence of the top event is calculated by fuzzy mathematical arithmetic (Zhao and Gong 2001). The advantage of this method is that the language used to evaluate events allows errors within a certain range so that a relatively accurate probability of occurrence of the fault tree top events can be obtained (Altabbakh et al 2013).…”
Section: Basic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this technique, although great at developing actions plans, requires preidentified hazards to operate-meaning it is intended to be employed after an incident. Also, the authors point out that "the model does not consider basic component risks, but is broader, encompassing system/organization wide issues" ( [17], p. 15).…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Sussex Library] At 13:13 30 Decmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In [17], various risk management models are compared against the shuttle disaster. From their analysis, they determined the best risk analysis method to employ is the Layers of Protection Analysis (LOPA) method.…”
Section: Downloaded By [University Of Sussex Library] At 13:13 30 Decmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous works classified uncertainty for early product and system design (Clarkson & Eckert, 2005; McManus & Hastings, 2006; de Weck et al, 2007). The risk management in early design was also investigated by Van Wie et al (2005), Lough et al (2009), Altabbakh et al (2013), and others. In the context of this work, we consider the underlying uncertainty of choosing new suppliers and new modules (possibly using new technologies) during supplier identification.…”
Section: Proposition For Uncertainty Information Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%