1977
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(77)83862-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variations in Removal Reasons and Culling Rates with Age for Dairy Females

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
28
0
3

Year Published

1979
1979
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
28
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The remarkable percentage of culling resulting from reproductive problems in the current study may be partially explained by the difference in the climatic conditions of Iran and the origin of Holstein cows. Similar findings were reported by some other authors (Allaire et al 1977;Bascom & Young 1998;Ruegg et al 1998). Mohammadi and Sedighi (2009) and Shahmoradi et al (2008) reported that infertility and reproductive problems are major factors in culling Holstein cattle in other regions of Iran.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remarkable percentage of culling resulting from reproductive problems in the current study may be partially explained by the difference in the climatic conditions of Iran and the origin of Holstein cows. Similar findings were reported by some other authors (Allaire et al 1977;Bascom & Young 1998;Ruegg et al 1998). Mohammadi and Sedighi (2009) and Shahmoradi et al (2008) reported that infertility and reproductive problems are major factors in culling Holstein cattle in other regions of Iran.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In addition, animals culled because of reproductive problems, infectious diseases and congenital defects are valuable animals for milk production. Thus, this culling imposes a very high expense on the farmer, and similar results have been reported (Allaire et al 1977;Weigel 2004;SahebHonar et al 2010). The estimates of variance components and corresponding genetic parameters are presented in Table 7.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, the model had a class for cows with unknown inbreeding (f*) and a class for cows with 0 inbreeding (f0). Five other classes (fi) were for cows with inbreeding coefficients (F) in the ranges 0 < F < 5%, 5 <~ F < 10%, 10 ~< F< 15%, 15 [2] where superscript o indicates solutions to the mixed model equations. Procedures for estimating standard errors of estimates in both models [2] and [3] are in the appendix.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As presented, models [2] and [3] ignore the different residual variances for cows with different inbreeding coefficients. For a noninbred cow with noninbred sire and MGS, the residual variance is:…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation