2007
DOI: 10.1142/6565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variational Methods for Strongly Indefinite Problems

Abstract: Inevitably, reading is one of the requirements to be undergone. To improve the performance and quality, someone needs to have something new every day. It will suggest you to have more inspirations, then. However, the needs of inspirations will make you searching for some sources. Even from the other people experience, internet, and many books. Books and internet are the recommended media to help you improving your quality and performance.But, what kind of resources are to take? We will share you a new way to g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus the space L 2 possesses the orthogonal decomposition: [10,14]) be equipped with the inner product…”
Section: The Functional Setting and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the space L 2 possesses the orthogonal decomposition: [10,14]) be equipped with the inner product…”
Section: The Functional Setting and Notationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is complete. Author details 1 School of Mathematical Science, Shanxi University, Wucheng Road, Taiyuan, 030006, P.R. China.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, by Lemma 3.1, a standard argument shows that {z j } is bounded (see, e.g., [18]). Next, by the conclusion (iii) of Lemma 3.1, it holds that…”
Section: Lemma 33 Let {Z J } Be a (C) C -Sequence For F Then It Ismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, by (H 0 )-(H 4 ), it is not difficult to show that S min is bounded in E (cf. [16] or [18]), hence, |u| 2 ≤ C 2 for all u ∈ S min and some C 2 . Therefore, as a consequence of Lemma 2.8 we see that, for each q ∈ [2, ∞), there is Λ q > 0 such that…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 11mentioning
confidence: 99%