2015
DOI: 10.1353/cj.2015.0073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation within Stability: Digital 3D and Film Style

Abstract: This article conducts an analysis of contemporary 3D film style in narrative features, examining how stereoscopy has been married to existing cinematic form. Formal examinations of 3D sequences show them to work within systems of classical or intensified continuity while also generating patterns of meaning tied to the 3D format.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Salah satu teknologi yang hadir dalam sinema adalah gambar stereoskopik atau tiga dimensi (selanjutnya akan disebut 3D). 3D menghasilkan persepsi ruang tiga dimensi dengan cara menampilkan gambar kembar dengan perbedaan halus ke mata kiri dan kanan penonton melalui teknologi polarisasi (Jones, 2015). Ciri khas dari teknologi 3D adalah adanya efek visual timbul dari layar.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Salah satu teknologi yang hadir dalam sinema adalah gambar stereoskopik atau tiga dimensi (selanjutnya akan disebut 3D). 3D menghasilkan persepsi ruang tiga dimensi dengan cara menampilkan gambar kembar dengan perbedaan halus ke mata kiri dan kanan penonton melalui teknologi polarisasi (Jones, 2015). Ciri khas dari teknologi 3D adalah adanya efek visual timbul dari layar.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…Unfortunately, I have not had the chance to see the Blacker Than Night in 3D, thus, my claims are based on the accounts of reviewers and on the "planar" 2D version of the movie. Yet, I assume, in dialogue with scholars of 3D films, that certain crucial aesthetic choices can actually be deduced from the compositions and camera movements seen in the 2D version as well(Higgins 2012;Jones 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%