2009
DOI: 10.1108/01445150910945606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation propagation modeling and analysis at preliminary design phase of multi‐station assembly systems

Abstract: PurposeDimensional variation management is a major challenge in multi‐station sheet metal assembly processes involving complex products such as automotive body and aircraft fuselage assemblies. Very few studies have explored it at a preliminary design phase taking into consideration effects of part deformation on variation propagation, since early design phase involves the development of imprecise design models with scant or incomplete product and process knowledge. The objective of this paper is to present a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the dimensional issues in the automotive body assemblies are comprehensively studied from the mechanical tolerance analyses to a series of fruits relating to the stream-of-variation analysis (SOVA) (Chase and Greenwood 1988;Ceglarek et al 2004;Cai 2008;Huang et al 2007;Huang and Kong 2008;Wang and Ceglarek 2009), and to the dimensional analyses for self-pierce riveted sheets (Cai et al 2005;Masters et al 2011). Among these researches, many insightful attempts target to more complex dimensional propagations, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On one hand, the dimensional issues in the automotive body assemblies are comprehensively studied from the mechanical tolerance analyses to a series of fruits relating to the stream-of-variation analysis (SOVA) (Chase and Greenwood 1988;Ceglarek et al 2004;Cai 2008;Huang et al 2007;Huang and Kong 2008;Wang and Ceglarek 2009), and to the dimensional analyses for self-pierce riveted sheets (Cai et al 2005;Masters et al 2011). Among these researches, many insightful attempts target to more complex dimensional propagations, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these researches, many insightful attempts target to more complex dimensional propagations, e.g. the three-dimensional (3D) rigid SOVA model (Huang et al 2007), the variation propagation model that considers the joining and releasing schemes especially for the preliminary design (Wang and Ceglarek 2009), the dimensional analysis taking the experimentally tested rivet distortions (Cai et al 2005), and the global finite element (FE) simulation projecting the riveted distortion yielded from the local FE analysis (Masters et al 2011). On the other hand, the mechanical strength and fatigue problems are mainly focused on for the aircraft structure safety that usually takes the local rivet joint as the crucial part Manes et al 2011;Aman et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they studied of the contact problem of the thin-walled metal structure assemblies, developed a systematic procedure of the non-linear dimensional variation analysis for the thin-walled metal structure assemblies by using the contact finite element method [26]. Wang and Ceglarek [27] represented a beam-based model based on the assumption that only selected critical points/features in the assembly are important to variation. They also deduced a state-of-the-art variation propagation model by integrating the influence of join error on variation propagation and incorporating them into a vector-based model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study was supported by the UK EPSRC project EP/K019368/1: "Self-Resilient Reconfigurable Assembly Systems with Inprocess Quality Improvement", the UKRI open access block grant and the WMG-IIT scholarship. (Corresponding author: Sumit Sinha) been shown to have limitations in their applicability to complex, high dimensional and nonlinear systems [2] as these used linear models between process parameters and measurements of product dimensional quality for both systems with rigid [3] and complaint parts [4]. Ceglarek et al [5] used CAD-based variation patterns and a fault matching technique which combined principal component analysis and pattern similarity for fault diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%