1969
DOI: 10.1063/1.1658106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of Electrical Properties with Zn Concentration in GaP

Abstract: The resistivity and Hall coefficient RH for Zn-doped GaP were measured at temperatures between 4.2° and 775°K. Neutron activation and through diffusion with radioactive 65Zn were used to determine the Zn concentration NZn, which ranged from 6.7×1016 cm−3 to 2.1×1019 cm−3. At the lowest Zn concentration the thermal ionization energy for Zn in GaP was found to be 0.060±0.002 eV. The thermal ionization energy decreases rapidly for Zn concentrations in excess of 2.0×1017 cm−3. Metallic impurity conduction was obse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
20
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
7
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These samples had typical mobilities of 300 cm 2 / V s and carrier concentrations of 8 ϫ 12 indicating that the presence of twins does not adversely affect carrier transport. The p-type mobility is lower than expected for single crystal GaP with a high acceptor density, 13 likely because of the structural disorder induced by changing the V/III ratio so drastically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…These samples had typical mobilities of 300 cm 2 / V s and carrier concentrations of 8 ϫ 12 indicating that the presence of twins does not adversely affect carrier transport. The p-type mobility is lower than expected for single crystal GaP with a high acceptor density, 13 likely because of the structural disorder induced by changing the V/III ratio so drastically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The temperature dependence of µ I is calculated from The effective screening density n * is n + [(n + N a )(N dd + N ds -N a -n)/(N dd + N ds )] and the static dielectric constant ε is 10.6 [17]. The mobility µ N for neutral impurity scattering is given by Erginsoy as [19] µ N = {1.4 × 10…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here the indirect exciton binding energy and the masses of the virtual crystal which appear in (3.14) were supposed to be weakly x-dependent, too. Thus the values of pure GaP were used (m, = 1 [7], m, = 0.5 [8], E , = 10 meV [9]). Further we have simplified the lineshape factor by assuming a: =at.…”
Section: Disorder-induced Indirect Exciton Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%