2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2021.104255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of Cu, Fe, S and Pb isotopes in sulfides from hydrothermal mineralization from the Yenice region in Çanakkale, Biga Peninsula, NW Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 106 publications
(193 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The δ 34 S values of biotite diorite fall within the range of volcanic H 2 S, and the δ 34 S values of altered rocks and breccia pipes vary greatly. Therefore, the ore-forming mechanism may be related to the progressive cooling and transition of the hydrothermal fluids that were dominated by H 2 S under relatively reducing conditions [71]. Moreover, the δ 34 S values of sulfide in the Yaotou area gradually become negative with depth.…”
Section: Sulfur Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The δ 34 S values of biotite diorite fall within the range of volcanic H 2 S, and the δ 34 S values of altered rocks and breccia pipes vary greatly. Therefore, the ore-forming mechanism may be related to the progressive cooling and transition of the hydrothermal fluids that were dominated by H 2 S under relatively reducing conditions [71]. Moreover, the δ 34 S values of sulfide in the Yaotou area gradually become negative with depth.…”
Section: Sulfur Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may indicate the transition from a low-temperature phyllic alteration to a high-temperature potassic alteration. The change in the chalcopyrite δ 65 Cu value resulted in the Cu isotope fractionation between the magmatic fluid and precipitating sulfides due to variations in the pH and the cooling of magmatic-hydrothermal fluids along the fluid pathway [71]. (Data from [10] and references therein).…”
Section: Cu Isotopic Variation In Chalcopyrite and Its Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process makes many metal minerals susceptible to leaching under acidic conditions, leading to heavy metal pollution (Hartley et al, 2020; Huang et al, 2019; Zhang et al, 2020). Numerous researchers have isolated acidic bacterial strains from sulphide minerals for the bioleaching of rare and precious heavy metals (Gan et al, 2019), and have conducted analyses to ascertain the primary pollution sources in certain sulphide minerals (Kang et al, 2020), including the bioleaching of elements like lead (Ram et al, 2021), zinc, chromium, cadmium, copper and arsenic (Çiçek et al, 2021). Additionally, the approach of microbial hydrometallurgy has been developed as an extension of this research (Adamou et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al 2018 43 reported on the Fe isotopic compositions of a suite of hydrothermal minerals (magnetite, pyrite, and chalcopyrite) and granodiorite porphyry from the giant Duolong porphyry Cu–Au deposit, central Tibet, and demonstrated that the Fe isotopic composition of chalcopyrite could be a useful diagnostic tool for distinguishing oxidized from reduced fluids in hydrothermal systems. Çiçek et al 2021 44 reported the iron, copper, sulfur and lead isotope compositions of mineralized samples from porphyry, skarn and epithermal mineralization in the Yenice region that lies to the east of the Biga Peninsula, Turkey, and demonstrated that the variation of Cu, Fe, S and Pb isotopes in sulfides from the various types of mineralization from the Yenice region provides important insights into the metal source and ore-forming fluid evolution in the area. Therefore, the Fe isotope ratio is an important indicator to trace the ore-forming source, determine metallogenic temperature, and study metallogenic system evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%