2005
DOI: 10.1007/s10722-003-6083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation of Agro-morphological Characters in Moroccan Barley Landraces Under Near Optimal and Drought Conditions

Abstract: In many areas of North Africa, barley is often the only possible rainfed crop. In these regions water deficit is the primary constraint affecting crop production. Twenty barley landraces collected from different localities in south Morocco and four modern varieties were characterized in two field experiments, one under wellirrigated and one under limited-irrigated conditions. Nine agro-morphological characters were evaluated: Plant height, tiller number per plant, number of grains per spike, number of spikes p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
9
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(7 reference statements)
4
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction of DH in normal and water deficit conditions was 4% in the first season and 3.3% in the second season, and the stress reduced all cultivars for HD indicting that the earlier heading in barley is the better adapted to low reainfed areas, whereas the earliness probably is the most efficient drought escape mechanism. These results were consistent with those of El-Seidy (1997), Shakhareh et al (2001), El-Madidi et al (2005 and Abu-El-Lail et al (2016). The stress intensity (SI) was equal to 3.99% in the first season and 3.38% in the second season indicating that DH trait proficient a minor water stress in the study.…”
Section: Days To Heading (Dh)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The reduction of DH in normal and water deficit conditions was 4% in the first season and 3.3% in the second season, and the stress reduced all cultivars for HD indicting that the earlier heading in barley is the better adapted to low reainfed areas, whereas the earliness probably is the most efficient drought escape mechanism. These results were consistent with those of El-Seidy (1997), Shakhareh et al (2001), El-Madidi et al (2005 and Abu-El-Lail et al (2016). The stress intensity (SI) was equal to 3.99% in the first season and 3.38% in the second season indicating that DH trait proficient a minor water stress in the study.…”
Section: Days To Heading (Dh)supporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the case of Aït Baha there was no effect, whereas Lannaceur showed a decreased contribution of the I‐P phase to the variable fluorescence following drought stress. El Madidi et al (2005) studied the drought tolerance of a set of Moroccan barley varieties using agronomical parameters. Oukarroum et al (2007) showed that a ranking according to the work of El Madidi et al (2005) correlated closely with a ranking based on a fluorescence parameter: the DFI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…El Madidi et al (2005) studied the drought tolerance of a set of Moroccan barley varieties using agronomical parameters. Oukarroum et al (2007) showed that a ranking according to the work of El Madidi et al (2005) correlated closely with a ranking based on a fluorescence parameter: the DFI. Here, the fluorescence transients used in the study of Oukarroum et al (2007) were reanalyzed and the ΔV IP values of control and drought‐stressed plants of each variety were calculated and are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, drought is a serious problem for crop production in arid and semi-arid areas of the world. Despite having an optimal range of between 500 and 650 mm of water during its production cycle [3], intra-seasonal drought episodes due to climate change are strongly linked to the yield loss of sesame crops in the Sudano-Sahelian zone [4,5,6], particularly when they reach critical stages during their growth and development cycle [1,7]. Indeed, not all stages of development have the same vulnerability; and the resulting consequence on vegetative growth, flowering, and maturity and consequently on the physiological quality of harvested seeds differ [6,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%