2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the flow rate of drip emitters in a subsurface irrigation system for different soil types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Alabas (2013), it occurs because pressurecompensating emitters are designed to discharge water at a uniform rate over a wide pressure range, while to the nonpressure-compensating emitters, the pressure variation must remain constant, so that, there is no large flow rate variation. In contrast, Nogueira et al (2021) evaluated the behavior of a pressure-compensating emitter (2.3 L h -1 ) and a non-pressure-compensating one (4.0 L h -1 ) on 4 different soil types (sandy loam, clay loam, silty loam, and clay) and noticed that, except for sandy loam soil application, the pressure-compensating dripper was the one that presented the major percentage variation between the subsurface and surface flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…According to Alabas (2013), it occurs because pressurecompensating emitters are designed to discharge water at a uniform rate over a wide pressure range, while to the nonpressure-compensating emitters, the pressure variation must remain constant, so that, there is no large flow rate variation. In contrast, Nogueira et al (2021) evaluated the behavior of a pressure-compensating emitter (2.3 L h -1 ) and a non-pressure-compensating one (4.0 L h -1 ) on 4 different soil types (sandy loam, clay loam, silty loam, and clay) and noticed that, except for sandy loam soil application, the pressure-compensating dripper was the one that presented the major percentage variation between the subsurface and surface flow.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of subsurface drip irrigation systems has been increasing due to its advantages over surface one, such as greater efficiency in water use and application, lower soil water evaporation and agricultural production improvements (Nogueira et al, 2021). However, in subsurface irrigation, soil physical and hydraulic properties can influence the hydraulic characteristics of the emitter (Wang et al, 2021) which contributes to the water distribution uniformity of this system can be lower than one for surface drip irrigation system (Cai et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Modern irrigation systems with high water use efficiency consume significant energy input. Innovative irrigation techniques are still needed to obtain high water efficiency with low energy consumption (Adu et al, 2019;Nogueira et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021). Water-saving irrigation technology such as subsurface irrigation, with water distribution emitters installed below the soil surface, maintains the soil surface relatively dry, reduces evaporation losses, improves crop yields, increases water use efficiency, and reduces labor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%