2010
DOI: 10.1080/00063650903437503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the diurnal activity of breeding Short‐eared OwlsAsio flammeus: implications for their survey and monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The diurnal activity of radiotagged Short-eared Owls in the present study (actively foraging from 52 to 75% of the time in 2011) was generally greater than that recorded by visual observations in 2006-07, when activity was recorded for less than 10% of the time through the season (Calladine et al 2010). Diurnal monitoring of the radiotagged owls was deliberately concentrated during periods when activity rates were expected to be high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The diurnal activity of radiotagged Short-eared Owls in the present study (actively foraging from 52 to 75% of the time in 2011) was generally greater than that recorded by visual observations in 2006-07, when activity was recorded for less than 10% of the time through the season (Calladine et al 2010). Diurnal monitoring of the radiotagged owls was deliberately concentrated during periods when activity rates were expected to be high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Field protocols aimed to assess ranging behaviour and habitat-use and how they varied through the breeding season and also between day and night. Surveillance of the radiotagged birds was undertaken entirely by volunteers (as was all fieldwork) with limited time and resources and as the principal aims included comparison of diurnal and nocturnal range sizes and habitat-use, priority within diurnal monitoring was given to early mornings and evenings when activity was expected to be greatest (Calladine et al 2010). During daylight, most locations of owls determined from radio signals were confirmed by visual observation, facilitated by the generally open terrain of the study area.…”
Section: Radiotelemetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…If multiple possible routes were available within a single grid, we chose routes expected to have the least traffic, routes on the edge of the greatest amount of roadless habitat, or routes with the highest likelihood of detecting Short-eared Owls (a potential source of bias discussed later). Larson and Holt (2016) report that in favorable conditions Short-eared Owls can be correctly identified up to 1600 m away, with high detectability up to 800 m. Calladine et al (2010) had a mean initial detection distance of 500 -700m, with a maximum recorded value of 2500 m. Because our analysis method is robust for false negative detections, but less so for false positive detections, we chose to assume a larger average initial detection distance of 1 km. Therefore we considered all land within 1 km of the surveyed points as sampled habitat.…”
Section: Transect Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%