2016
DOI: 10.5751/ace-00819-110103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) surveys in the North American Intermountain West: utilizing citizen scientists to conduct monitoring across a broad geographic scale

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The Short-eared Owl (Asio flammeus) is an open-country species breeding in the northern United States and Canada, and has likely experienced a long-term, range-wide, and substantial decline. However, the cause and magnitude of the decline is not well understood. We set forth to address the first two of six previously proposed conservation priorities to be addressed for this species:(1) better define habitat use and (2) improve population monitoring. We recruited 131 volunteers to survey over 6.2 mill… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We provided participants with 2 3-week survey windows, depending upon latitude and elevation, during our March through May survey season in which to perform each survey. We selected the survey windows for each grid cell to best account for the expected period of short-eared owl courtship flight behavior, a time of maximum detectability (Larson and Holt 2016;Miller et al 2016Miller et al , 2022. Although participants could choose any day within the survey windows to perform each survey, we requested that the 2 visits be ≥1 week apart if possible.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We provided participants with 2 3-week survey windows, depending upon latitude and elevation, during our March through May survey season in which to perform each survey. We selected the survey windows for each grid cell to best account for the expected period of short-eared owl courtship flight behavior, a time of maximum detectability (Larson and Holt 2016;Miller et al 2016Miller et al , 2022. Although participants could choose any day within the survey windows to perform each survey, we requested that the 2 visits be ≥1 week apart if possible.…”
Section: Field Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occupancy models have been increasingly used to analyze data from citizen‐science projects, which often document aspects of search effort (e.g. number of observers, time spent searching) or ask that volunteers attempt to report all species of a known taxon within defined sampling units (Bled et al 2013, Van Strien et al 2013, Berberich et al 2016, Miller et al 2016, Louvrier et al 2018). An ever‐increasing wealth of opportunistic data arising from digital citizen‐science portals (e.g eBird, naturGucker, iNaturalist) has required careful consideration of how this unstructured data can be translated into a format that is appropriate for the occupancy modeling framework.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abundance can be relatively straightforward to estimate for sessile organisms occurring within a restricted range (Dzul et al 2013); however, estimating abundance of mobile organisms with wide geographic distributions is more difficult (Whitehead 2002, Dennhardt et al 2015. Geographically broad sampling strategies designed to estimate abundance over large areas can be expensive (Millsap et al 2013, Nielson et al 2014, require large numbers of people (Miller et al 2016), and can be logistically difficult or near impossible to implement across remote landscapes (Dunn et al 2005). These factors have collectively limited researchers from rigorously estimating densities and population sizes of many wildlife species in Alaska (Alaska Department of Fish and Game [ADFG] 2015), including the Golden Eagle (Aquila chrysaetos).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%