1936
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0150280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the Development of Embryos of Hens’ Eggs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
1

Year Published

1936
1936
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 presents the frequency of various somite numbers of one hundred fifty-three 48-hour embryos. It is apparent that the majority of 48-hour embryos were in the 12 to 18 somite range, but the total range was from 6 up to 25 somites conforming with the findings of McNally and Byerly (1936). Also shown are the number of embryos in each somite group which showed a beginning of amnion development as represented by It can be noted that, although the majority of the embryos of 20 or more somites showed amnion growth, there were a number in the more advanced groups that did not, and in the majority of all embryos there was no visible development of the amnion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 presents the frequency of various somite numbers of one hundred fifty-three 48-hour embryos. It is apparent that the majority of 48-hour embryos were in the 12 to 18 somite range, but the total range was from 6 up to 25 somites conforming with the findings of McNally and Byerly (1936). Also shown are the number of embryos in each somite group which showed a beginning of amnion development as represented by It can be noted that, although the majority of the embryos of 20 or more somites showed amnion growth, there were a number in the more advanced groups that did not, and in the majority of all embryos there was no visible development of the amnion.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It would seem quite plausible to assume from the data that some of the larger individuals would also fall into this category. McNally and Byerly (1936) found that the embryos showing the most advanced development at 48 hours had the highest rate of mortality, those showing the least advanced development had the next highest mortality while the intermediate group had the least mortality, substantiating the hypothesis that factors other than "slow developing, weak embryos," per se, were in part responsible for the mortality peaks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Since the time lag between the hatching of the first and the last chick may be long, this may be an important factor affecting early chick performance. Incubation period have been found to lengthen (Olsen, 1942;Williams et al, 1951, Hudson et al, 2004 to shorten (McNally & Byerly, 1936;Smith & Bohren, 1975;Burton & Tullet, 1985) or not to change (Reis et al, 1997) with the aging of hens and the consequent increases in egg size. Variations in incubation length may be related to breed and line within breed and therefore this trait may be altered by selection Smith & Bohren, 1975).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…McNally and Byerly (1935) also studied this problem by counting somites after 48 hours of incubation. They found that the number of somites in the embryos decreased slightly in eggs laid during the latter part of the day.…”
Section: Tracing the Developing Eggsmentioning
confidence: 98%