1977
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1977.sp011785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in the action spectrum of erythrolabe among deuteranopes.

Abstract: SUMMARY1. Eight deuteranopes matched a mixture of a monochromatic light on the long wave side of the neutral point and a violet (450 nm) primary to a fixed white as well as a monochromatic light on the short wave side of the neutral point mixed with a red (650 nm) primary, to the same white. For A > 530 nm, the former set of matches defined the action spectrum of the long wave sensitive foveal cones, and for A < 480 nm, the latter that of the short wave sensitive cones.2. Individual differences in the former m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…68 In accordance with this finding, there is reported to be a modest difference of 4.3 nm in max of two L cone pigment absorption spectra derived with photobleaching in tissue culture cells transfected with DNA clones of human genetic material. 69 These measurements, indicating a modest range of differences in the cone pigments among individuals, are generally consistent with conclusions from psychophysical studies, yielding estimates of little 67 or modest [71][72][73][74] variability for the range of max differences in any cone class among color-normal individuals. However, results from microspectrophotometry 75,76 are consistent with a larger variability of 10-12 nm in the peak absorption of L as well as M cone photopigments.…”
Section: B Individual Variability In Cone Spectral Sensitivities Andsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…68 In accordance with this finding, there is reported to be a modest difference of 4.3 nm in max of two L cone pigment absorption spectra derived with photobleaching in tissue culture cells transfected with DNA clones of human genetic material. 69 These measurements, indicating a modest range of differences in the cone pigments among individuals, are generally consistent with conclusions from psychophysical studies, yielding estimates of little 67 or modest [71][72][73][74] variability for the range of max differences in any cone class among color-normal individuals. However, results from microspectrophotometry 75,76 are consistent with a larger variability of 10-12 nm in the peak absorption of L as well as M cone photopigments.…”
Section: B Individual Variability In Cone Spectral Sensitivities Andsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The apparatus is the trichromator previously described (Alpern, Bastian, Pugh & Gras, 1976;Alpern & Pugh, 1977). A disk-annulus matching field is supplied by three primaries (444.5, 550, and 650 nm) made 'monochromatic' by narrow band (10 nm half band width Baird Atomic) interference filters, two of them in light beams illuminating the annulus (30 outer diameter) the third, in one supplying the central disk (10 diameter).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wave-length discrimination predictions from INTRODUCTION Two previous papers in this series studied foveal vision in deuteranopic dichromacy. Every one of fifteen deuteranopes lacked one foveal photolabile pigment (Alpern & Wake, 1977) and subtle individual differences were found in erythrolabe (the remaining red-green cone pigment) even in addition to any differences imposed by variability in eye media losses (Alpern & Pugh, 1977). If, as is commonly believed, deuteranopia is a reduced form of trichromatic vision then similar individual differences must appear in the long wave cone visual pigment of trichromats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Alpern and Pugh (1977) have data suggesting that differences in the maximum of the long wavelength photopigment vary over a 7 nm range. Molion (1982) has summarized a number of studies that suggest this possibility and reviewed possible sources of error.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Color Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%