1985
DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600740221
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Hepatic Extraction Ratio with Unbound Drug Fraction: Discrimination Between Models of Hepatic Drug Elimination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These analyses of the taurocholate and rose bengal data have led us to surmise that data which support the rather complex albumin receptor model may equally well be explained in terms of the simpler well-stirred model. This is consistent with the general observation that the well-stirred model predicts a higher elimination rate than the parallel tube model, for a given concentration of unbound substrate (7,22). The converse does not apply, since experiments supporting the well-stirred model, involving perturbations of hepatic blood flow rather than unbound fraction of substrate (23)(24)(25), cannot be readily explained in terms of receptor-mediated uptake.…”
Section: Hepatolocysupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These analyses of the taurocholate and rose bengal data have led us to surmise that data which support the rather complex albumin receptor model may equally well be explained in terms of the simpler well-stirred model. This is consistent with the general observation that the well-stirred model predicts a higher elimination rate than the parallel tube model, for a given concentration of unbound substrate (7,22). The converse does not apply, since experiments supporting the well-stirred model, involving perturbations of hepatic blood flow rather than unbound fraction of substrate (23)(24)(25), cannot be readily explained in terms of receptor-mediated uptake.…”
Section: Hepatolocysupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This limitation appears to have been recognized by Keiding and Priisholm (31) who recently repeated their earlier study of ethanol (28), but used an experimental design more appropriate for discriminating between the two models. Similarly, phenytoin was claimed to follow the well-stirred model (32), but the method used clearly does not discriminate (22). None of these studies (14, 15, 27-29, 32) attempted to fit the alternate model to their data.…”
Section: Hepatolocymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacity-limited, but binding-sensitive hepatic elimination (for example digitoxin, mexilitine, midazolam, erythromycin, and tolbutamide) Usually these drugs show low intrinsic clearances, but high plasma protein binding (>85%), although there are some drugs with a large hepatic intrinsic clearance despite very high binding to plasma proteins. 13 It is dif®cult to generalize on the effects of liver dysfunction on the elimination of drugs in this group.…”
Section: Capacity-limited Binding-insensitive Hepatic Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such studies have been employed to discriminate among the various models of hepatic drug elimination. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Several investigators have explored various aspects of altered tissue binding on hepatic disposition kinetics of drugs. [10][11][12][13][14][15] Nevertheless, study on the appropriateness of a model of hepatic clearance to accommodate changes in tissue binding remains challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%