2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy Rates According to Racial Groups in Young Women with Breast Cancer, 1998 to 2011: A Report from the National Cancer Data Base

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
58
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This trend has been observed previously among woman <45 years of age diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. 33 Previous research has also shown similar prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations among breast cancer patients of European, African, and Hispanic ancestry. 34 Mammography screening rates appear to be higher among women of European ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…This trend has been observed previously among woman <45 years of age diagnosed with early stage breast cancer. 33 Previous research has also shown similar prevalence of BRCA1/2 mutations among breast cancer patients of European, African, and Hispanic ancestry. 34 Mammography screening rates appear to be higher among women of European ancestry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…While disparities in oncologic treatments and outcomes by patient race and insurance status have been consistently demonstrated in the published literature, 1114 whether rates of guideline-concordant care differ by where breast cancer patients receive treatment have not been fully described. A study by Cliby et al used NCDB data to show that treatment at an academic center was independently associated with a higher rate of guideline-concordant care for ovarian cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community education status was designated by the proportion of zip‐code residents without a high school diploma, and income was area‐based, with measurements calculated from data based on the patient's zip code. Using the area‐based indicators of income and education, a socioeconomic (SES) variable was created to describe patients living in low, middle and high SES areas as previously described . Patients living in the lowest quartile income and education areas were classified as low SES, and patients living in the highest quartile income and education areas were classified as high SES.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%