Background
Although over 40% of new breast cancer diagnoses in the U.S. are in older women, few studies have assessed the outcomes of post-mastectomy reconstruction in this population. Our objective was to evaluate age effects on postoperative complications and patient-report outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction, and to investigate whether age effects differ between reconstructive procedure types.
Study Design
Eligible patients in the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium study from 11 institutions (57 providers) in North America were analyzed. Two-year complications and PROs via BREAST-Q domains were compared across younger (<45 years), middle-aged (45–60 years), and older (>60 years) women. Mixed-effects regression models were used, controlling for a range of demographic and clinical covariates.
Results
A total of 1,531 patients were studied: 494 younger, 803 middle-aged, and 234 older. Age was not a significant predictor of complications. For sexual well-being two years post-reconstruction, older women reported 4.25 (p=0.04) higher mean scores with implant procedures, and 10.39 (p<.01) higher mean scores with autologous procedures compared to younger women. No age effect was seen with implant procedures with regards to physical and psychosocial well-being; however, older women who underwent autologous procedures reported 6.07 (p<.01) higher physical and 8.21 (p<.01) higher psychosocial well-being scores than younger women.
Conclusions
Age did not significantly affect complication rates. Older women demonstrated higher sexual well-being for both procedures, and better satisfaction, physical and psychosocial well-being than younger women with autologous procedures. Post-mastectomy reconstruction is a viable option for older patients, with risks and benefits comparable to those in younger women.