2016
DOI: 10.1075/lv.16.2.03din
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variant-centered variation and the like conspiracy

Abstract: The conventional methodology of variationist linguistics foregrounds the variable as the object of study: each variant is situated in the envelope of variation against the other variants it competes with. This paper argues that it is necessary to look beyond the context of the alternations a variant participates in in order to get a full picture of the factors affecting variation. The multi-functional variantlikeis used as a case study to illustrate the value of a variant-centered analysis: the fact that sever… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that language play has easy access to the abstract space that surrounds a linguistic variable-where overlap exists with similar structures and/or forms (see Aaron 2010, Dinkin 2016, Brook 2018. This sets up a prediction that language play is anything but willy-nilly; rather, the set of places in the grammar where we observe it ought to follow logically (in some way not yet well understood) from the present properties of the language and variety in question.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We suggest that language play has easy access to the abstract space that surrounds a linguistic variable-where overlap exists with similar structures and/or forms (see Aaron 2010, Dinkin 2016, Brook 2018. This sets up a prediction that language play is anything but willy-nilly; rather, the set of places in the grammar where we observe it ought to follow logically (in some way not yet well understood) from the present properties of the language and variety in question.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 77%