Language play is language variation: Quantitative evidence and what it implies about language change

Abstract

This article argues that language play is intimately related to linguistic variation and change. Using two corpora of online present-day English, we investigate playful conversion of adjectives into abstract nouns (e.g. made of awesome ∅), uncovering consistent rule-governed patterning in the grammatical constraints in spite of this option stemming from deliberate subversion of standard overt suffixation. Building on Haspelmath's (1999) notion of 'extravagance' as one of the keys to language change, we account for the systematic patterning of deliberate linguistic subversion by appealing to tension between the need to stand out and the need to remain intelligible. While we do not claim that language play is the only cause of linguistic change, our findings position language play as a constant source of new linguistic variants in very large numbers, a small proportion of which endure as changes. Our conclusion is that language play goes a long way toward accounting for linguistic innovations—with respect to where they come from and why languages change at all.

Obsolescence and abortive innovations in variationist approaches to language change

“…Obsolescent forms thus naturally become available for use in language play (van Compernolle, 2008, p. 331, Childs & Van Herk, 2014; Bohmann et al., 2021; see also Brook & Blamire, 2023). Crystal (2008:147) suggests that Early Modern English words found in the works of Shakespeare that might today be used for ‘poetry or comic archaism’ include ‘ oft , perchance , sup , morrow , visage , pate , knave , wench , and morn ’.…”