2010
DOI: 10.4995/wrs.2001.449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variance Components and Response to Selection for Reproductive, Litter and Growth Traits Through a Multi-Purpose Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heritability of the litter weight at day 21 was moderately low, varying between 0.08 and 0.17 depending on the parity. Similar values were reported by other authors (Ayyat et al, 1995;Lukefahr and Hamilton, 1997;Rastogi et al, 2000;Moura et al, 2001).…”
Section: Additive Genetic Componentssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heritability of the litter weight at day 21 was moderately low, varying between 0.08 and 0.17 depending on the parity. Similar values were reported by other authors (Ayyat et al, 1995;Lukefahr and Hamilton, 1997;Rastogi et al, 2000;Moura et al, 2001).…”
Section: Additive Genetic Componentssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the P breed we observed negligible genetic trends for number of kits born alive (0.01), but this finding can be explained by the fact that this line was not selected for litter size. Moura et al (2001) and Santacreu et al (2005) reported similar values (0.03-0.05 kit/yr), Garreau et al (2005), Baselga (2002a, 2002b) and Lenoir and Garreau (2009) obtained much larger genetic trends (0.12 kit/yr). In the M line, after 10 yr the litter size will only increase by 0.3-0.4 kits.…”
Section: Genetic Trendsmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The response of 9.57g and 10.33g for body weight in generation one and two respectively in males was lower than 49.8 g/d and 45.9 g/d reported by Piles and Blasco (2003) on the growth rate of rabbits. Moura et al (2001) also reported 17.2 g in rabbits. The observed values of 14.54g and 1.85g for body weight in generations one and two in females were higher than 0.6 g/d for average daily gain reported by Szendro et al (1992).…”
Section: Selection Response Of the Breedsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…), phenotypic variation coefficients (CV%), heritability estimates (h 2 ±SE) and calculated economic values (a) of post-weaning growth traits and carcass attributes et al, 2012;Garreau et al, 2008;Moura et al, 2001). The h 2 -estimates for carcass compositional traits indicated that the percentage of carcass weight deposited as bone (BP) was more heritable (0.91) than that deposited as muscle (MP = 0.31) or fat (FP = 0.35).…”
Section: Variability and Heritabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%