2014
DOI: 10.21829/azm.2014.302107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variación morfológica asociada a los patrones de color de la garganta, en lagartijas Sceloporus horridus horridus (Sauria: Phrynosomatidae)

Abstract: El dimorfismo sexual, es un fenómeno común en lagartijas del género Sceloporus, lo que permite identificar diferencias en el tamaño de cuerpo, y diseño morfológico, entre machos y hembras. Lo más común es que ocurran variaciones en el color disociadas de la morfología. Utilizando ANDEVA de una vía y análisis discriminante, obtuvimos diferencias significativas en seis caracteres morfológicos en correlación con color de la garganta; lo que permite reconocer tres diferentes fenotipos (amarillo,azul y naranja). Si… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In lizards, differences between morphs have generally been linked to differences in spatial dispersion within the landscape, body size, aggression, territory and/or home range size, and the quality of the habitats used (Thompson & Moore, 1992; Sinervo & Lively, 1996; Bustos-Zagal et al, 2014). These differences could indicate that different morphs are capable of exploiting different components of a resource gradient, and consequently that trophic niches could also diverge (Lattanzio & Miles, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In lizards, differences between morphs have generally been linked to differences in spatial dispersion within the landscape, body size, aggression, territory and/or home range size, and the quality of the habitats used (Thompson & Moore, 1992; Sinervo & Lively, 1996; Bustos-Zagal et al, 2014). These differences could indicate that different morphs are capable of exploiting different components of a resource gradient, and consequently that trophic niches could also diverge (Lattanzio & Miles, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given possible differences in energy intake and expenditure between territorial and non-territorial individuals, and that prey may differ in the quantity and quality of their nutrients, morphs might also be expected to differ in their diet (Leyte-Manrique & Ramírez-Bautista, 2010; Cruz-Elizalde et al, 2014). In addition, morph-specific variation in coloration may be associated with other morphological traits, such as body size (snout-vent length; SVL) and/or head size (Hover, 1985; Sinervo & Lively, 1996; Moore, Hews & Knapp, 1998; Sinervo et al, 2000; Bustos-Zagal et al, 2014). Some of these morphological features that distinguish each morph could also act as a constraint on the type of prey that each can consume, further driving a divergence in diet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the genus exhibits extreme reproductive variation including oviparous and viviparous species as well as continuous and seasonal activity (Gribbins et al., ; Méndez‐de la Cruz, Villagrán‐Santa Cruz, & Andrews, ). Furthermore, the Sceloporus genus has numerous species in which multiple morphotypes exist within the same population (Bastiaans et al., ; Bustos Zagal, Castro‐Franco, Manjarrez, & Fajardo Guadarrama, ; Jiménez‐Arcos, ; Rand, ; Stephenson, ). This variation makes them excellent models for studies concerning reproductive characteristics and their interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This variation makes them excellent models for studies concerning reproductive characteristics and their interactions. However, there have been few comparisons among male morphs within Sceloporus including morphological (Bustos Zagal et al, 2014;Jiménez-Arcos, 2013;Stephenson, 2010), life history traits, performance (Jiménez-Arcos, 2013), frequency (Jiménez-Arcos, 2013;Rand, 1990), coloration intensity and its hormonal control (Calisi & Hews, 2007;Rand, 1990Rand, , 1992, behaviour (Bastiaans et al, 2014;Stephenson, 2010) and microhabitat use (Bustos Zagal et al, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation