2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.optm.2008.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variables associated with the incidence of infantile esotropia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior studies have reported that infantile esotropia occurs in 1% to 2% of all new-born children,7–12 and even recent publications refer to it as the most common form of pediatric strabismus 13–19. However, such statements are in contrast to the findings from this study in which only 1 in 403 newborns were diagnosed with infantile esotropia.…”
Section: Commentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Prior studies have reported that infantile esotropia occurs in 1% to 2% of all new-born children,7–12 and even recent publications refer to it as the most common form of pediatric strabismus 13–19. However, such statements are in contrast to the findings from this study in which only 1 in 403 newborns were diagnosed with infantile esotropia.…”
Section: Commentcontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of strabismus in the family showed no aswith ET (p= 0.83) and XT (p= 0.62), although studies show the heredity as a factor associated to strabismus 7,8,14 . There is a need for more research in this area to check this association, since it is common the presence of several cases of strabismus in the same family, mainly ET.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…These data for ET are found in the literature. [7][8][9] There is a need for more studies to relate sex to strabismus, mainly horizontal strabismus, more common in practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evidence from epidemiological investigations had confirmed that strabismus was associated with premature delivery (Cotter et al 2011;Maconachie et al 2013), low birthweight but not premature (Torp-Pedersen et al 2010a,b;Gulati et al 2014), method of delivery (Dobson & Sebris 1989;Pathai et al 2010) and hereditary (Abrahamsson et al 1999;Birch et al 2005;Major et al 2007). The results of our meta-analysis also further provided supports for a possible effect of infant birthweight on the risk of strabismus among smoking pregnant mothers, although the association was not statistically significant (p for interaction> 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…; Major et al. ). The results of our meta‐analysis also further provided supports for a possible effect of infant birthweight on the risk of strabismus among smoking pregnant mothers, although the association was not statistically significant (p for interaction> 0.05).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%