1. Menitsky Yu. L. Genus 27. Savory Satureja L. Flora of European Part of USSR L., 3, p. 183 (Nauka, Leningrad, 1978).
2. List P. H., Hörhammer L. et al. Hagers handbuch der pharmazeutischen praxis, 299 p (Springer-Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 1979)
3. Zlobin Y. A. Population ecology of plants: modern state, points of growth, 263 p (Universitetska kniga, Sumy, 2009).
4. Mihajilov-Krstev T. Chemical composition, antimicrobial, antioxidative and anticholinesterase activity of Satureja montana L. ssp montana essential oil Central European Journal of Biology, (9) 7, 668 (2014)
5. Sojic B. The effect of winter savory (Satureja montana L.) extract on the quality of cooked pork sausages, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 333. 012103. (2019).
6. Maccelli A. Satureja montana L. Essential Oils: Chemical Profiles/Phytochemical Screening, Antimicrobial Activity and O/W Nano Emulsion Formulations, Pharmaceutics, 12, 7, 1 (2020).
7. Vitanza L. Satureja montana L. essential oil and its antimicrobial activity alone or in combination with gentamicin, Microb. Pathog., 126, 323 (2019).
8. Jelezniak T., Vorniku Z. Receiving planting material of mountain savory (Satureja montana L.) at a vegetative reproduction, Agrobiodiversity, p. 205 (2017).
9. Marco N. V., Bakova N. N. The use of the in the Saturea montana L. preparation of spicy mixtures, Woks of the State Nikit. Botan. Gard., 146, p. 179 (2018).
10. Ushakova I. T., Bespalko O. V., Kharchenko V. A., Molchanova A. V. and Levko G. D. Variability of the main agronomic valuable traits of mountain savory (Satureja montana L.) in «Bobrik» varieties. Vegetable crops of Russia, 3, p. 25 (2019).
11. Ed. by Dr. Sci., Prof. Yena A. V. & Dr. Fateryg A. V., Red book of the Republic of Crimea. Plants, algae and fungi, 480 p (ARIAL LLC, Simferopol, 2015).
12. Golubev V. N. The biological flora of the Crimea, 126 p (GNBS, Yalta, 1996).
13. Ed. Rubtsova N. I. Key for higher plants of Crimea, 549 p. (Publishing House of Science, Leningrad, 1972).
14. Rabotnov T. A. The Life Cycle of Perennial Herbaceous Plants in Meadow Cenoses, Works of BIN AN SSSR, 3, 6, 7 (1950).
15. Uranov A. A. Age range of coenopopulations as a function of time and energy wave processes, Biological Sciences, 2, 7 (1975).
16. Smirnova O. V. Grass cover structure of broad-leaved forests, 208 p. (Nauka, Moscow, 1987).
17. Zhukova L. A. The diversity of ontogenesis pathways in plant populations, Ekologiya, 3, 169 (2001).
18. Zhivotovsky L. A. Ontogenetic states, effective density and classification of plant populations, Ecology, 1. 3 (2001).
19. Zhukova L. A. Dynamics of coenopopulations of field plants in natural communities. In: T. I. Serebriakova (ed.). Dynamics of coenopopulations, 9 (Nauka, Moskow, 1987).
20. Zlobin Yu. A. On the inequality of individuals in plant populations, Botanical Journal, 65, 3, 311 (1980).
21. Zlobin Yu. A. Principles and methods of studying coenotic plant populations, 146 p (KGU Publishing House Kazan, 1989).
22. Zlobin Yu. A. Reproduction in flowering plants: the level of individuals and the level of populations, Biological Sciences, 7, 77 (1986).
23. Odum Yu., Ecology, 1, 328 p (Mir Publishing House, Moscow, 1986).
24. Vakhrusheva L. P., Abdulganieva E. F., Morphological criteria of age status and ontogenesis of Hedysarum tauricum Pall. Ex Willd (Crimea), Scientific notes of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Series Biology, Chemistry, 1 (67), 2, 27 (2015).