2006
DOI: 10.1080/00103620600817523
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Soil Analysis in Commercial Laboratories: Implications for Lime and Fertilizer Recommendations

Abstract: Data of soil analysis of 20 samples of 84 commercial laboratories were used to estimate discrepancies among results and analyze the implications for fertilizer recommendations. More than 90% of the laboratories had all results of basic routine analysis of individual samples within the confidence interval (CI). Laboratories with the best performance in the proficiency test (grade A) had only 2.9 and 4.0% of the results outside the CI for the basic and the micronutrient set, respectively. However, the correspond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
6

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
15
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The standard error was low, around 2. Cantarella et al [56] studied variations between laboratory analyses and concluded that a range of 20% would be acceptable. Demattê et al [57] used this type of comparison between laboratory and spectroscopy measurements and concluded that most results were within the indicated range.…”
Section: Prediction Models Of Soil Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The standard error was low, around 2. Cantarella et al [56] studied variations between laboratory analyses and concluded that a range of 20% would be acceptable. Demattê et al [57] used this type of comparison between laboratory and spectroscopy measurements and concluded that most results were within the indicated range.…”
Section: Prediction Models Of Soil Attributesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, there are frequent misunderstandings laboratory, reaching ranges of 3-26% error in chemical analysis for determining macronutrients and 15-32% for analysis of grain size (CANTARELLA et al, 2006). It was found in the determination of hematite in sugarcane area, through the average particle diameter and density, that the MS was added 13.3% can explain the content of the hematite more than when it was performed regression without MS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…En la figura 5 se evidencia que los mapas elaborados con los grupos de 200 y 500 muestras presentan mayor semejanza al mapa de datos medidos para el contenido de arcilla en ambos horizontes. Cantarella et al (2006) afirman que la diferencia entre mapas para la determinación de una misma propiedad puede estar asociada a errores de muestreo, que son generalmente mayores que los errores derivados del análisis de suelos.…”
Section: Colombia Forestalunclassified