2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10548-007-0036-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Electrode Positions Using Electrode Caps

Abstract: We investigated the variability of electrode positions for a multi-channel, custom electrode cap placed onto participants' heads without taking scalp measurements. The electrode positions were digitized in a three-dimensional space for 10 young adult participants on three separate occasions. Positional variability was determined for 15 selected electrodes within the three-dimensional preauricular-nasion (PAN) coordinate system and from this system, angular coordinate variability was also determined. The standa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(16 reference statements)
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A standard EEG cap is manufactured according to the International 10/20 system. Considering the uncertainty of manual operation, when the cap is put on the head of a subject, the position of each hole is expected to be offset from the corresponding 10/20 landmark with a random error of about 0–13 mm (Atcherson et al, 2007 ). Therefore, we simulated the manually sampled point set in two steps (Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard EEG cap is manufactured according to the International 10/20 system. Considering the uncertainty of manual operation, when the cap is put on the head of a subject, the position of each hole is expected to be offset from the corresponding 10/20 landmark with a random error of about 0–13 mm (Atcherson et al, 2007 ). Therefore, we simulated the manually sampled point set in two steps (Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results from our proposed NIRS-EEG probe also compare favorably to the precision error reported in studies evaluating a NeuroMedical cap (Compumedics USA, El Paso, Texas), which ranged from 3.0 to 12.7 mm. 39 Studies of the projection of the 10-10 positions onto the brain show a standard deviation of 4.6 mm in x, 7.1 mm in y and 7.8 mm in z, 55 which is larger than the error introduced by our NIRS-EEG head probe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Placing electrodes using caps has been shown to cause significant electrode positional error, making them an inappropriate method when accuracy is necessary. 39 In this work we aim to demonstrate that our NIRS-EEG head probe can be used to accurately and precisely place electrodes.…”
Section: Sensor Locationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrode placement for EEG was done in accordance to the international federation in electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology as a 10-20 electrode placement system. 13 14 EEG recordings were obtained in two settings: before chewing paraffin gum (Saliva-Check kit, GC Corporation, Japan) and after three minutes of chewing gum with one-minute resting intervals between each EEG recording. The recordings were made for the total of fifteen minutes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%