2014
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-014-0239-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability of Competitive Performance of Elite Athletes: A Systematic Review

Abstract: Understanding the contributions of race dynamics, power output, environment, skill, and subjective scoring to the variability of athletic performance should help identify and evaluate strategies for performance enhancement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
85
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, when evaluating the 'non-responders', one subject (female) improved her performance with BRJ (1.2% PO; 2.6% distance; 1.2% speed) ( Table 4). Even though the performance results (PO, distance) of all groups were insignificant with regard to BRJ supplementation, the coefficient of variation (CV) for performance in sprint and endurance sports is 0.6-1.4% and our mean values fit within or are greater than this range [29]. However, since all the groups (whole, 'responders', and 'nonresponders') had values within this range our results as to whether BRJ supplementation is of benefit to performance is inconclusive.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Further, when evaluating the 'non-responders', one subject (female) improved her performance with BRJ (1.2% PO; 2.6% distance; 1.2% speed) ( Table 4). Even though the performance results (PO, distance) of all groups were insignificant with regard to BRJ supplementation, the coefficient of variation (CV) for performance in sprint and endurance sports is 0.6-1.4% and our mean values fit within or are greater than this range [29]. However, since all the groups (whole, 'responders', and 'nonresponders') had values within this range our results as to whether BRJ supplementation is of benefit to performance is inconclusive.…”
Section: Performance Measuresmentioning
confidence: 45%
“…After modeling the results of a range of sports [14, 61], Hopkins et al suggest that “worthwhile” changes to the outcome of most events require a performance difference equal to approximately 0.3 – 0.5 times the variability (coefficient of variation [CV]) of performance for that event. Furthermore, across a range of events the CV of performance of top athletes is usually within the range of 0.5–3%, with some variability according to the type of event and the caliber of the performer [61].…”
Section: Individual Responses To Supplement Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pursuit of excellence in performance already established in many areas of the world of work has also been applied in the field of sports (Barnett, 2006;Malcata & Hopkins, 2014). It is feasible to assume that the effects of training sessions on sleep and fatigue among athletes are similar to those observed in real-life workers.…”
Section: Sleep Fatigue Performance and Alertnessmentioning
confidence: 99%