2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0924-4247(99)00389-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaporizing liquid microthruster

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, propulsion systems require large weight and size due to the propellant tank, and much further miniaturization is required. However, most state-of-the-art thrusters are not allowed even for Class I microspacecraft, [1][2][3][4] and Class II and III microspacecraft require entirely new types of thrusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, propulsion systems require large weight and size due to the propellant tank, and much further miniaturization is required. However, most state-of-the-art thrusters are not allowed even for Class I microspacecraft, [1][2][3][4] and Class II and III microspacecraft require entirely new types of thrusters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, future CubeSat missions involving constellation or formation flight will require that the satellites be equipped with a propulsion system that can operate within the stringent resource limitations of the satellite and deliver enough ∆ for their orbital maintenance [3]. There are ongoing research activities in this regard aimed at miniaturizing the space proven and conventional propulsion systems, which can be found in [1,[4][5]. However, scaling of conventional propulsion systems to the size and power limitations of 1 CubeSats, while retaining their operational performances is difficult and complex, and therefore requires the investigation of alternative approaches [6].…”
Section: Iintroductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] Silicon has been used predominantly for fabrication of microneedles, however the fragility and the cost of the microfabrication process are major drawbacks for this material. [1][2][3][4] Injection molding has instead emerged as an alternative fabrication process offering advantages such as cost and robustness. 16,17 Microneedles can offer minimally invasive tools in the field of analytic a l science for example in order to achieve high-density chemical mapping thus to measure chemical heterogeneities in biological systems such as in tissues and organs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%