2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2009.06.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vapor–gas/liquid nucleation experiments: A review of the challenges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Many homogeneous water nucleation experiments were conducted in the past decades. [3][4][5][6][7] With various experimental methods, the measured nucleation rates range from 10 4 m −3 s −1 up to 10 23 m −3 s −1 . The nucleation pressures vary between 40 kPa and 4.0 MPa, while nucleation temperatures range from 200 K to 320 K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Many homogeneous water nucleation experiments were conducted in the past decades. [3][4][5][6][7] With various experimental methods, the measured nucleation rates range from 10 4 m −3 s −1 up to 10 23 m −3 s −1 . The nucleation pressures vary between 40 kPa and 4.0 MPa, while nucleation temperatures range from 200 K to 320 K.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, experiments since the 1980s have brought forth quite ambiguous results on the influence of the amount and the type of the carrier gas on the observed nucleation rate. A comprehensive review of the subject is given by Brus et al [2006], and, as noted by Anisimov et al [2009], the pressure effect is deemed as one of the most challenging topics in nucleation research. The measurements conducted by Brus et al [2006, 2008] and Hyvärinen et al [2006] in diffusion based devices increased the knowledge of the carrier gas effect on n‐ alcohols.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing a successful nucleation standard and introducing this standard into common nucleation research practice will be key advancements in the field. Having a better understanding of the effects of carrier gas will clarify the nature of the inconsistencies between different experimental data sets (Anisimov et al, 2003(Anisimov et al, , 2009 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research is part of an effort to obtain better Figure 6. Recent data by Brus and colleagues (2005) (Anisimov et al, 2009 280, 275, 270, and265 °K. Open symbols: Lihavainen andViisanen (1998a, 1998b) (Brus et al, 2005).…”
Section: Empirical Gas Pressure Effectmentioning
confidence: 91%