2005
DOI: 10.1128/aac.49.12.5046-5050.2005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium : Catheter Colonization, esp Gene, and Decreased Susceptibility to Antibiotics in Biofilm

Abstract: To evaluate the molecular characteristics and antibiotic susceptibility in biofilm of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) organisms that had caused catheter-related VREF bacteremia (VREF-CRB), we compared 22 isolates causing bacteremia obtained from patients with VREF-CRB with 30 isolates from control patients with gastrointestinal colonization by VREF. Using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, we identified 17 unique strains among the 22 VREF-CRB isolates and 23 strains among the gastrointestinal i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
32
3
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
32
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the lack of a significant association between Esp and biofilm formation in the current study, other researches reported conflicting results about the role of E. faecalis Esp in biofilm formation (23,42,43,(45)(46)(47)(48). Although biofilm formation in esp-deficient mutants of E. faecalis was not reported in all studies, many others report no correlation between the presence of esp and biofilm formation, which is a multifactorial process (49,50).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…Despite the lack of a significant association between Esp and biofilm formation in the current study, other researches reported conflicting results about the role of E. faecalis Esp in biofilm formation (23,42,43,(45)(46)(47)(48). Although biofilm formation in esp-deficient mutants of E. faecalis was not reported in all studies, many others report no correlation between the presence of esp and biofilm formation, which is a multifactorial process (49,50).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 43%
“…This low percentage may be explained by the fact that Esp is not essential for intestinal colonization or translocation of Enterococcus faecium and Enterococcus faecalis isolates, as shown in murine models (Heikens et al, 2009). However, Raad et al (2005) and Ruiz-Garbajosa et al (2006) have reported higher percentages of esp carriage among colonizing isolates as compared with infecting ones. Contradictory results have also been published, comparing esp incidence among VRE and VSE (Billström et al, 2008;Duprè et al, 2003;Vankerckhoven et al, 2004;Woodford et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Although Esp appeared to be important for biofilm development (20,36,41) in some studies, E. faecalis isolates lacking the esp gene did produce biofilm in vitro (6,12,16,27). Furthermore, for both E. faecium and E. faecalis, isolates were found that carried the esp gene but that failed to produce biofilms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In a recent study, the N-terminal region of Esp, covering approximately half of the protein in E. faecalis, was identified as the region of the protein involved in biofilm formation (38). In other studies, however, biofilm development appeared to be independent of Esp (6,12,16,27). In E. faecalis, several other factors have been associated with biofilm development, like the sugar-binding transcriptional regulator BopD (13), the quorum-sensing locus fsr (12), heterogeneity in surface charge (43), the bee locus (37), and the secreted metalloprotease GelE (12,16,25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%