2019
DOI: 10.3390/batteries5010013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vanadium Electrolyte for All-Vanadium Redox-Flow Batteries: The Effect of the Counter Ion

Abstract: In this study, 1.6 M vanadium electrolytes in the oxidation forms V(III) and V(V) were prepared from V(IV) in sulfuric (4.7 M total sulphate), V(IV) in hydrochloric (6.1 M total chloride) acids, as well as from 1:1 mol mixture of V(III) and V(IV) (denoted as V3.5+) in hydrochloric (7.6 M total chloride) acid. These electrolyte solutions were investigated in terms of performance in vanadium redox flow battery (VRFB). The half-wave potentials of the V(III)/V(II) and V(V)/V(IV) couples, determined by cyclic volta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The setup was equipped by additional pair of reference and glassy carbon electrodes, which were positioned in electrolyte tanks to monitor the cathodic, anodic redox, and half‐cell potentials (for details of cell design, see ref. [24]). The charging was conducted in galvanostatic–potentiostatic mode: the end‐of‐charge voltage was set to 1.65 V for galvanostatic step at 75 mA cm −2 and then the cutoff current was 2.5 mA cm −2 at applied voltage of 1.65 V. For discharge, the end‐of‐discharge voltage was set from 0.8 to −0.2 V depending on the electrolyte sample, i.e., appearance of “power drop” effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The setup was equipped by additional pair of reference and glassy carbon electrodes, which were positioned in electrolyte tanks to monitor the cathodic, anodic redox, and half‐cell potentials (for details of cell design, see ref. [24]). The charging was conducted in galvanostatic–potentiostatic mode: the end‐of‐charge voltage was set to 1.65 V for galvanostatic step at 75 mA cm −2 and then the cutoff current was 2.5 mA cm −2 at applied voltage of 1.65 V. For discharge, the end‐of‐discharge voltage was set from 0.8 to −0.2 V depending on the electrolyte sample, i.e., appearance of “power drop” effect.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason, the extreme values of the OCV are considered experimentally. Many studies agree that the maximum value of the cell voltage during the charge is between 1.6 and 1.7 V, and drops to 1.1 V in the discharge case [82,83].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The electrochemical activity and the concentration and stability of vanadium ions determine the energy density and the reliability of the VRFB. Therefore, these factors contribute to electrolyte technology improvement and are still under optimization towards a more reliable and cost-effective system [65][66][67][68]. The development of new electrode components for VRFB systems will certainly increase in the short-medium term for many industrial and residential applications.…”
Section: Inorganic Aqueousmentioning
confidence: 99%