2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.04.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valvectomy Versus Replacement for the Surgical Treatment of Tricuspid Endocarditis

Abstract: Tricuspid valve endocarditis patients who undergo tricuspid valve excision, repair, and replacement have similar 30-day operative mortality, as defined by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Excision patients have significantly lower unplanned readmission rates at 1 year. Tricuspid valvectomy is an acceptable initial treatment in this high-risk group as part of a surgical strategy to identify patients who are candidates for eventual valve replacement. Further study of long-term outcomes and survival is warranted. Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a single-center retrospective study comparing patients with IVDU-associated isolated tricuspid infective endocarditis, there were no differences in 30-day operative mortality, bleeding requiring reoperation, major stroke, prolonged ventilator time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay between patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy or replacement (13). Furthermore, Protos et al (13) demonstrated that patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy had significantly lower unplanned hospital readmission rates at 1 year, compared to those who underwent replacement.…”
Section: Random Effects Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a single-center retrospective study comparing patients with IVDU-associated isolated tricuspid infective endocarditis, there were no differences in 30-day operative mortality, bleeding requiring reoperation, major stroke, prolonged ventilator time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay between patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy or replacement (13). Furthermore, Protos et al (13) demonstrated that patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy had significantly lower unplanned hospital readmission rates at 1 year, compared to those who underwent replacement.…”
Section: Random Effects Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a single-center retrospective study comparing patients with IVDU-associated isolated tricuspid infective endocarditis, there were no differences in 30-day operative mortality, bleeding requiring reoperation, major stroke, prolonged ventilator time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay between patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy or replacement (13). Furthermore, Protos et al (13) demonstrated that patients who underwent tricuspid valvectomy had significantly lower unplanned hospital readmission rates at 1 year, compared to those who underwent replacement. An important recent study of surgical outcomes for isolated IVDU-associated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis, utilizing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) adult cardiac surgery database, and using a contemporary cohort of patients demonstrates that valvectomy was an independent predictor of operative mortality (14).…”
Section: Random Effects Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As rates of IDU-IE requiring surgical intervention have been increasing throughout the opioid epidemic nationally, 5,13 cardiac surgeons have been deliberating on the best way to care for these patients. Due to the risk of recurrence/reinfection associated with drug use 14 and the limited nature of resources, different strategies have been proposed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protos and colleagues [1] performed a single-center, retrospective, smaller sample size (n ¼ 63) study that compared 3 surgical approaches for the treatment of tricuspid valve endocarditis: repair (n ¼ 12), valve replacement (n ¼ 26), and valvectomy (n ¼ 25). They found that there was no difference in mortality between the groups, with only 1 death and an overall 30-day mortality of 1.6%.…”
Section: Invited Commentarymentioning
confidence: 99%