2001
DOI: 10.1080/02827580120186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values of Forestry Professionals and their Implications for the Applicability of Policy Instruments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
1
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
27
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These insights can help to tailor policy instruments and incentives towards better addressing forest managers' needs in the future, and thus support the implementation of climate change adaptation measures. However, while the specific beliefs and value systems of forestry professionals might differ (Pregernig 2001), it is important to recognize that also professional norms, habits, and traditions play an important role for management responses (Primmer and Karppinen 2010), as does their institutional environment (Zivojinovic and Wolfslehner 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These insights can help to tailor policy instruments and incentives towards better addressing forest managers' needs in the future, and thus support the implementation of climate change adaptation measures. However, while the specific beliefs and value systems of forestry professionals might differ (Pregernig 2001), it is important to recognize that also professional norms, habits, and traditions play an important role for management responses (Primmer and Karppinen 2010), as does their institutional environment (Zivojinovic and Wolfslehner 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These interviews certainly supplement the information provided by surveys about the attitudes and opinions of forestry professionals and the implementation of forest polices (Twight and Lyden 1988, Dove 1992, Brown and Harris 1998, Pregernig 2001, Hugosson and Ingemarson 2004, Hoogstra and Schanz 2008, Kindstrand et al 2008, Primmer 2008. It is suggested that in future development the social character of forest planning be emphasized and that the interwoven nature of planning and providing advice with societal norms being recognized.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These practices should be explored as a part of the interwoven interaction relationship prevailing between social communities and ecological systems. The values, attitudes, and beliefs of forestry professionals influence the implementation of forest policy tools (Dove 1992, Pregernig 2001, Primmer 2008 and so practices are assumed to differ. Several studies have revealed that investigating "ground-level" practices is a fruitful approach in studying the development of planning (Flyvbjerg 2001), counseling (Silverman 1997), and policy implementation (Leskinen 2006).…”
Section: General Aim and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also takes the less interventionist preference of regulatees as a given, which is not always the case. An example: Pregernig (2001) asserts that in forest policy, instrument preferences are dependent on the forest owner type: environmentalists prefer informative instruments, forestry entrepreneurs prefer financial incentives and traditionalists prefer legislation.…”
Section: Critical Reflection Of Smart Regulation Criticsmentioning
confidence: 99%