2017
DOI: 10.1080/08865655.2017.1402201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Values and Power Conflicts in Framing Borders and Borderlands: The 2013 Reform of EU Schengen Governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Storylines are always embedded in broader structures of discourse (Hajer, 1997), and storylines that become institutionalized shift these structures in ways that make them more amenable to the frames communicated by the storyline. Coman (2018), in her analysis of the 2013 structural funds reform, finds that changes in crisis perceptions also interacted with changing power relations between EU institutions and changes in the ideational structure of prevailing discourse (see also: Coman, 2017). Also drawing on the fast-versus slow-burning distinction, she argues that the Parliament was sidelined during the fast-burning years by a strong partnership between the Council and Commission, but as perceptions changed toward slower-burning crises, the Council in turn became sidelined by a growing partnership between the Parliament and the Commission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Storylines are always embedded in broader structures of discourse (Hajer, 1997), and storylines that become institutionalized shift these structures in ways that make them more amenable to the frames communicated by the storyline. Coman (2018), in her analysis of the 2013 structural funds reform, finds that changes in crisis perceptions also interacted with changing power relations between EU institutions and changes in the ideational structure of prevailing discourse (see also: Coman, 2017). Also drawing on the fast-versus slow-burning distinction, she argues that the Parliament was sidelined during the fast-burning years by a strong partnership between the Council and Commission, but as perceptions changed toward slower-burning crises, the Council in turn became sidelined by a growing partnership between the Parliament and the Commission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rules and politics of labor mobility are becoming increasingly contentious and important to the political economy of the European Union (EU). Where issues such as brain drain within the Single Market used to be taboo, European politicians have recently become bolder in drawing attention to the potential 'dark sides' of labor mobility (Coman, 2017). Brain drain reflects a tendency for human capital to agglomerate where it is already abundant 'in what appears as an international competition to attract global talent' (Beine, Docquier, & Rapoport, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new intergovernmentalism states that since the beginning of the 1990s decisions at the EU level are inluenced by the European/Council to the detriment of supranational institutions. It suggests that Member States have been increasingly inclined to solve collective problems by strengthening the power of intergovernmentalism, whereas the power of supranational institutions has been impaired (Fabbrini and Puetter 2016;Coman 2017;Bonjour et al 2018). The rise in power of Member States is relected in the attempts of the European Council to instruct the Commission and the Council to pursue particular policy initiatives, thereby monopolizing the agenda setting (Puetter 2015, p. 166).…”
Section: Normative Power Vs Civilian Power In the Shadow Of Intergovmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kategoria granicy stanowi jeden z politycznych fundamentów powojennych procesów integracyjnych w Europie, zarówno w wymiarze wewnętrznym, jak i zewnętrznym. Wymiar wewnętrzny dotyczył początkowo zasady nienaruszalności granic i poszanowania integralności terytorialnej państw, z czasem akcent przesunął się na procesy deborderyzacji (Jańczak, 2011), które próbując wcielić w życie mit "Europy bez granic" zmaterializowały się w zasadach i praktyce Układu z Schengen (Coman, 2017). Ciekawszym z punktu widzenia prowadzonej analizy jest jednak wymiar zewnętrzny.…”
Section: Granice Zewnętrzne Unii Europejskiej I Granice W Działaniach Zewnętrznych Unii Europejskiejunclassified